• SophismaCognoscente@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a good op ed and one with which any supporter of enlightened democracy should agree. The Supreme Court are playing fast and loose with public trust at a time when partisanship has crippled the other branches of government and polarization is dividing the country.

    How can anyone respect a court that explicitly has no ethical standard?

    • hotspur@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doing gods work, clicked through hoping someone had posted an archive link—thanks.

    • nymwit@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks! I’m really impressed all the embedded links (at least the nyt ones) to other related articles are also archive links.

  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s about lack of consequences. Ethics only constrain people that don’t have the power to not give a fuck about what other people think is ethical.

    • blivet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, that’s how it is. The last time I served on a jury we all got free donuts, because a juror on another case earlier in the day had brought in donuts for the court, and the judge and bailiffs weren’t allowed to accept them.

  • popemichael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would they care? They are, consequence free, rewriting the laws to more fit their needs.

    They don’t need to justify their existence when there is no consequence for any action that they take…

  • hamid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    John Roberts is a literal classical tyrant in the platonic sense and should be removed from government by any means necessary.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The highest court in the land has lower ethical standards than pretty much any job out there. I have to report a gift of maybe $15 but these clowns who make decisions affecting hundreds of millions of people can do whatever they want. How can we even pretend we live in a democracy?

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    In defense, the justices invoked the “Whoever smelt it, dealt it” defense, and replied “no, u”