- cross-posted to:
- lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
Cross posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/13163327
You must log in or # to comment.
I mean… they still aren’t actually brother and sister, so… 🎉?
Honestly seems like a happy story.
Seems that way to me.
This deserves to have the whole story linked
Please don’t link that race-baiting, xenophobic, racist, hate-stirring utter shitrag
The world will be a much better place if we just stop clicking shit like that, uplifting stories are still clickbait to get you to read more of their made-up gash journalism
Here is the article for you
Mother finds out her son’s bride is her long-lost DAUGHTER on their wedding day Sophie Tanno 3 minutes Mother finds out her son’s bride is her long-lost DAUGHTER on their wedding day after spotting birthmark on her hand (but marriage goes ahead because the groom had been adopted)
20:10, 06 Apr 2021 , updated 09:03, 07 Apr 2021
-
A woman discovered her long-lost daughter was her son's bride on wedding day -
The woman was reportedly able to recognise her daughter from a birth mark - The bride and her mother were pictured crying and embracing one another
A woman discovered her long-lost daughter was her son’s bride on their wedding day in China.
The woman was reportedly able to recognise her daughter, from whom she had been separated from many years ago, by a birthmark on her hand on the day of the ceremony.
The bride and her mother were seen crying and embracing one another during the surprise reunion in Suzhou, Jiangsu province on March 31, as reported by Times News Now. The bride and her mother were seen crying and embracing one another during the surprise reunion in Suzhou, Jiangsu province
The wedding was able to go ahead after it was established that the woman’s son had been adopted, meaning they were entirely unrelated to each other.
The woman had reportedly decided to adopt a son after searching in vain for her daughter for years.
According to Times Now News, the groom’s mother noticed the birthmark on the bride’s hand. On hearing the story, the bride burst into tears and described the moment of meeting her biological mother as ‘happier than the wedding day itself’
She was prompted to ask the bride’s parents if their daughter had been adopted.
The parents were taken aback by the question before saying that they had adopted the child after finding her by a roadside over 20 years ago.
On hearing the story, the bride burst into tears and described the moment of meeting her biological mother as ‘happier than the wedding day itself’, the publication reported.
The wedding was able to go ahead despite the shocking revelation and the couple exchanged their vows.
My point is that if only The Mail and their affiliates are reporting it, it’s made up for clicks
That article links to another
which is a source in India that launched in partnership with Reuters. I could be wrong, but it seems legit enough.
I looked them up, it’s a TV station that originally started in partnership with Reuters but now has nothing to do with them. In fact it’s owned by a private family.
It’s been heavily criticised and reprimanded for biased and patently false reporting 😂
But not all of their reporting, as far as I can tell those accusations are around the politics in India, which is hardly strange. Saying all their reporting is false is like saying FoxNews’ reporting on archaeology and deep space discovery is false just because their political stories are mostly bullshit, even though they’re just repeating the same archaeology and space content as everyone else. Get back to me with proof that particular story is actually false then.
-
Request denied, go bitch about something else now.
