The US Air Force Is Fast-Tracking a Blended Wing Body Jet to Fly in Just 4 Years::It could lead to stealth tankers and transports—and benefit civilians, too.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Amazing how quick they can work when they’re building aircraft that do one thing well

    This is an F-35 hate account. F-22 gang

    • GONADS125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I don’t know… Can it hover in place and operate without sound like the recent triangular UAP sightings?

      Edit: For any skeptics who haven’t truly and honestly evaluated the evidence for the existence of UAP, I strongly encourage you to read my post here.

      • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ever drive through a city with the airport near the highway and see the airplanes approaching to land? They look like they are hovering there.

        • GONADS125@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah. And I used to live near Eglin AFB. That’s not what was witnessed and not what I was describing.

          I edited my comment above with this link in which I have compiled significant evidence supporting the existence of UAP, as in anomalous crafts.

          It’s not an irrational, wild belief. It’s based in reality and from admissions from government/military officials and declassified and leaked records. There’s hard data in the form of video, expert eye-witness accounts, and radar data that all corroborate one another in some events. Read the section on the Nimitz Event that I have written.

          I used to discount this as a bogus fringe topic, and admittedly I joke that I’ve become Dale Gribble (RIP Johnny Hardwick…). But the reality is that there is validity to the existence of anomalous crafts that represent breakthrough/disruptive technology.

      • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sigh. Ok. Why are they ALWAYS seem to fit human-sized pilots? Look at our Earthly animals. There’s ants to blue whales. Why are the ayyliums ALWAYS in fuckable sizes, not long-horses gerraffes sized? Oooooooo. HOVERING!!! Truly an unobtainable mode of flight beyond the ken of Humans which only the ayylmaoians can do. Whoah!!!

        • GONADS125@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Good job making absolutely no substantive point and trying to undermine this as an erroneous subject when it’s not. You also are clearly misinformed when there are clearly varying sizes to the UAP.

          Furthermore, would you look at an aircraft carrier and assume that it must be some massive physical beings inside, rather than many beings of smaller stature?

          Your grand stand is nothing more than a display of your own ignorance. Read my post and refute the substantial evidence that anomalous crafts exist. It does not mean the crafts could not be of human origin. Just look at the declassified Project 1794 which I have in my post.

          Your fixation on whether or not UAP are of terrestrial origin has absolutely no bearing on whether or not the crafts exist. It’s nothing more than a strawman argument (logical fallacy).

          If you want to have a genuine discussion on the matter, actually formulate an argument instead of acting like a childish redditor and insulting other people on a subject you’re clearly ignorant of.

          I am not presenting big-haired ancient alien nonsense from the history channel. I present valid information and a rational argument.

          If you think this is not a valid subject of study and that those who do are dumb, then you must be smarter than world renown scientists studying this subject.

          Just because you haven’t caught up and are still disregarding the subject due to preconceived internalized beliefs, it doesn’t mean it is not a credible subject. If you truly think I’m ignorant and you’re right, read my post and then get back to me. Otherwise I might as well be arguing with an anti-vaxxer who refuses to acknowledge the evidence.