• AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    114 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The high court’s conservative majority found that the Trump administration did not follow federal law when it reversed course and banned bump stocks after a gunman in Las Vegas attacked a country music festival with assault rifles in 2017.

    The 6-3 majority opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas said a semiautomatic rifle with a bump stock is not an illegal machine gun because it doesn’t make the weapon fire more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger.

    “A bump stock merely reduces the amount of time that elapses between separate functions of the trigger,” Thomas wrote in an opinion that contained multiple drawings of guns’ firing mechanisms.

    The Biden administration said that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives made the right choice for the gun accessories, which can allow weapons to fire at a rate of hundreds of rounds a minute.

    Under Republican President George W. Bush and Democrat Barack Obama, the ATF decided that bump stocks didn’t transform semiautomatic weapons into machine guns.

    The plaintiff, Texas gun shop owner and military veteran Michael Cargill, was represented by the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a group funded by conservative donors like the Koch network.


    The original article contains 751 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @Stereotype_Be@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    112 days ago

    I live in the town where most bump stocks were made. After the ban they closed down and a lot of jobs were lost. I wonder if they’ll try to come back.

  • NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    -214 days ago

    I believe this is the right court decision. People try to make everything partisan, but you can’t just make up laws at will.

    I have no issue with bump stocks being banned. The issue is it has be done legally.