• Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can we also talk about how this quote makes just no sense in this case…?

    The quote implies that you don’t have to give them fish, you can just teach them to fish, because they can reasonably learn to fish in an hour or so. They’re unlikely to starve in that timeframe.

    Kids on the other hand go to school to learn to ‘fish’, i.e. earn their own money, for more than a decade. You can’t just say nah, they don’t need food, we’re teaching them how to earn it, when that teaching process takes magnitudes longer than it takes for a kid to starve to death.

    • underwire212@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ah, but you see; you have made the grave error of using logic and reasoning.

      The less you think about it, the more it makes sense 😉

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The quote implies

      No it doesn’t? It never says not to do both. Just that one is short term, the other is long term. You’ve applied your own interpretation.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fair enough. I’m guessing, the lady using the quote had the same implication in mind, though? Otherwise, I’m really not sure what point she was trying to make.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve exclusively heard the proverb used by people who want to restrict or withhold any form of public or direct assistance, so I feel like your interpretation is reasonable

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Which is funny, because I’ve actually never heard it used that way before. 🙃

            Although, that’s probably because I’m not from a country with English as primary language.

  • casmael@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    …… it’s almost as if some people have decided that ‘christianity’ means whatever they want it to mean……