• 2 Posts
  • 6.51K Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月30日

help-circle

  • In my experience, it’s about behind where the clit is. If you make your thumb and index/middle finger into the shape of a tuning fork, insert the fingers, you can rub both at the same time. Some women enjoy this, though get permission before you try!

    Also, don’t stimulate with your finger tip, as it’s very easy to unintentionally involve your finger nail. Use the pad of your finger, and yes, it’ll be a bit less comfortable for you, but way more comfortable for her. If you automatically switch to easier movements when you get tired, keep your nails trimmed and try to keep the contact closer to the pad than the tip (I know that nothing sucks more than getting your partner close but also getting too tired to keep up the movement to finish her, don’t scratch her in that moment).



  • When I played OW, Moira was one of my top characters. It wasn’t rare for me to top both damage and healing charts because of how aggressively I played her.

    See an enemy? Throw and orb, drain them, phase away unpredictably if they turn their attention on me, then throw another orb their way to punish them if they do chase, chasing them back if they don’t (or maybe abandoning the fight if there’s something more strategic to do).

    See a teammate? Throw and orb and heal, aiming the orb to also harass whoever they are fighting, then use the teleport either defensively if they try to kill the healer or if we’re headed into a team fight maybe use it offensively to teleport behind their line and surprise them with an orb and draining their healer. If you were good with orb placement and timing, they might not even notice you’re in the room with them before their team is half dead.

    I wish blizzard didn’t suck so much. I kinda miss that game.



  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.worldtome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 小时前

    I think it is a photoshop. The level of jpeg makes it harder to see, but there’s some back lighting that only affects J Lo’s hair, no signs of it on either twin. Also, her jaw line looks like it was pasted poorly and the lighting on the front of her face looks off (though that could just be makeup).

    Edit: Hard to say for sure, though, as that back lighting does match the window behind her and I’m not sure specular highlights would even show up in that black hair. Plus, skintone aside, the lighting on the front looks correct and wouldn’t be easy to do. Someone getting that right wouldn’t then miss the specular highlight on her hair (or found a source pic where someone else was blocking a similar light).

    But the jpeg artifacting looks kinda more pronounced on her face, too. But not wildly so.




  • At a high level, there’s two main ways to handle increasing/decreasing scores: event-focused or state-focused.

    For event-focused, you basically have different events that can affect the score. Adding clothing with trigger an event that adds score if it’s a good placement or reduces if it’s bad, and then vice versa for removing clothes. You can have other modifiers like maybe the first time something is worn, extra points are awarded or maybe preferences are modified.

    For state-focused scoring, you’ll pretty much recalculate the score from 0 each update. Clothes being worn get added to the score and clothes not worn don’t affect it. This one has less flexibility but is more likely to end up with a coherent score because it’s being recalculated from scratch each time (so any bugs will be easier to reproduce).



  • Or ask if round earth is a massive conspiracy, what’s the angle? How does getting people to believe in a flat earth rather than a round one serve an agenda to the point where even a simple test that could prove the flatness always “goes wrong”? And if they say that the experimenters get threatened or something, why do they generally remain as confused flat earthers afterwards? If they were going to be threatened, why half-ass it and let them continue pushing flat earth instead of making them change sides?








  • Not to mention people being too lazy to want to do even basic maintenance. Also companies that prefer to sell something people need to keep buying over and over might not offer a longer term version.

    Not vaping or even disposable, but my manscaped face trimmer, which is supposedly a higher end one, was the first electric trimmer I’ve gotten that didn’t come with a little bottle of lube and the instructions even said “you don’t need to lube this!” Knowing that they hadn’t changed the laws of physics, I lubed it anyways and I’m convinced that’s the only reason it hasn’t permanently seized up by now because even with the lube and a full charge, there have been times where it didn’t want to start going without a good tap after turning it on.


  • What an entitled and dumb twat. I guess he didn’t think it through that the guy maintaining it now doesn’t have some magical ability to tell who would be a good new owner and “handing over the mainline” to any one person could screw people more than any AI changes because that new person might be malicious or neglectful.

    Forks need to earn trust and it’s best that that step isn’t skipped by some inheritance. Not that there even is any obligation to hand it off no matter how many people rely on it or complain.

    And the comparison with ms or Google was dumb because I didn’t expect them to do it the way I wanted and stopped using what I could to get away from where they were going and any expectation that they hand over their projects to someone else would be ridiculous (and Google open source projects have been forked).