Yup. I can see that. Thankfully, there is no right answer for little things like this in English.
Yup. I can see that. Thankfully, there is no right answer for little things like this in English.
Yeah, I existed there for quite a while and I’m by no means a socialist. Then I think it was Tiananmen Square Day the year before the exodus to Lemmy that they suddenly cracked down on anyone who was like, “okay but we don’t want to starve or get run over by tanks either, so democracy is probably a good thing to keep.”
The anchors clearly wish so too. As evidenced by the network running the second debate agreeing to no muting of mics or fact checking. Only for the moderators to do both.
To which a President may say, “the court and what army?”
And we either put several million people on the streets in DC or lose our democracy at that moment.
That said there is something nobody is accounting for. If Trump loses the election the GOP could just abandon him at that point. Declare him the weird intern who only ever did coffee runs.
That’s actually a really good layman’s explanation. I’m going to use that combined with, “you’re not a capitalist just because you support them. Capitalists are the people who own the capital.”
Easy. We set the FBI on all the actual leftists decades ago. So the movement is having to slowly rebuild itself in the US. As a result Progressives are the farthest left things most Americans have experience with.
Or you could just use the context, like any other homograph.
Iirc Columbus did go back and do his share of abusing too though.
Of course it’s not. I said as much above. It’s an example of the Flexibility of Language.
Absolutely not. She has never endorsed that.
Honestly we’ve known peak oil would occur in our lives for several decades. Not that you could tell by any project to prepare for such an event.
Key terms are not always proper nouns. The intent is to be able to see the headline, scan the piece and read the in depth parts only if you need to. So it could look something like,
Status of Farming Co-op in Opforistan East
We assess this project to be RED because of missing heavy equipment. Local Civil Affairs unit reports they believe OPFOR elements are involved. State department asset concurs this project is infeasible due to ENEMY ACTION.
Then add like, 30 sentences of details I don’t care to replicate right now. But the idea is as this report goes up the chain everyone can see the status, and the general reason why. Generally you’re going to capitalize who, what, why, where, and when if the title doesn’t make it clear. So missing here would just be when. But that could also just be the time of the report.
Buckle up, here we go again!
You’re thinking about academic writing. Informal, marketing, opinion pieces, and really most other forms of writing allow for capitalizing as a less intrusive way to emphasize. Heck the military goes full bore and capitalizes the entire word for key terms and names.
It’s the polite way to emphasize words. But also in ideological discussions there’s just so many nouns.
Nice to see r/LateStageCapitalism is still letting tankies run off allies.
Mechanically it’s a small nuke on a medium range Air to Surface Missile. They straight up told everyone it’s entire purpose is as “the last warning shot” before their nuclear missile submarines fire their entire load of nuclear ballistic missiles.
The other way I’ve heard the French cold war doctrine reasoned is, “we may not be able to stop the Russians at the Fulda Gap, but we’re all going to be picking through the rubble together this time.”