This is a very easy to miss use, but you should use yes | … for this type of action

This was a pretty awesome read. Thanks for sharing.

I kind of got your frustration, I also would love for more options in the marcher for “steam machine-like” consumer hardware, almost like a “console” version of the steam machine.

Fair point, but a more “unhinged” text also don’t bring the discussion that I want to have in the piefed/lemmy… so I need to choose for the boring, unhinged or comedic text.

My natural words goes harder on the acid and sarcastic wording, if I tone down I can get on the “comedic” flair, which in my humble view, is sightly pleasant to read.

But if the few words were enough for us to get here and start the conversation, the text already proved its worth.

Most of the universities in South America a public.
The ones that aren’t public usually are company funded, not “students funded”.

Heavily coupled code with a lot of duplication of code. These are the main points of the refactor.

There is some lack of “smart” use of the JS, like the positional arguments instead of objects (for quick fix/change), no separation of concerns, there is something lightly there, but lacks the gross thing.

While one reader goes on the

“[…] Are you using AI? Then stop, you won’t learn […]”

someone else understood my feeling towards it. Thanks for the kind words.

What aspect of the chimera? Like the mythological way? Or this is closer to the “parts of everything touching”?

Hahahaha

That’s a pretty accurate description on most of the wrong parts :D

Are you using AI? Then stop, you won’t learn.

The problem isn’t the lack of usage, but how to use, and this is a learning point in it.

“the cards moved like they were sedated,” that’s literally the only requirement in a card game, don’t release anything if it’s broken.

I only notice that this would be a problem after having the alpha testing with my close friends and some other people. Also, there is logs and other tools for the understading on what is happening on the project.

Where is the source code?

I think I left the source somewhere in the original post, this is closer to a self evaluation on the ideas and concepts used.

I would disagree with you. But I don’t have the time or mental capacity to discuss on the topic.

I decided to look who is the author. He is a fucking “ex-Instagram” engineer, already a shitty thing, he loves subscription while holding a company that benefits from this type of source. Again shitty. While he centralizes in him (and probably fucking some federated options), instead of focusing on the federated approach. Like usual from an imperialist and bulshitter, he does have something to sell with this post. Shitty person.

This is one of the worst articles I’ve ever read. The author’s level of stupidity makes me regret the time I spent reading it.

He’s so deeply entrenched in his own ignorance that he can’t see the signs of the broken system, the concentration of wealth, the erosion of privacy, and the loss of control over our data. Of course, he also overlooks piracy.

His errors are so numerous and profound that any attempt to engage in a meaningful discussion would require him to come out of his stupor.

For my use case, didn’t work. But I was in a more spec driven than anything else. So maybe with a shorter spec file would have a better result.

Yet this is my problem, A tool that “waste” tokens, is slow (with some tasks taking 30~40 minutes) and generating a result, while a model running locally can do the 70% in 5min. It’s a huge difference.

And don’t forget, at the end of the day, I would still need to look into the code and fix some stuff myself.

And if compared with Deepseek (which had fit best on my use case), it’s even faster like 1~3 minutes, to get on the 90% of the result, on a fraction of the cost. This is the points that I’m focused, and a enterprise should either understand that the market have changed, or pay the price. And looks like we will pay the price.

Thanks for the reading, the original post was somewhat unhinged. It was a very long debugging session for the alpha thing, the AI tooling weren’t helping. And I was losing my mind over my morning coffee. But I fixed the little details.

I think the reality of the AI tooling for coding fall in the “middle”, it isn’t the 10x or 100x described by people, it’s closer to a 10%~15% performance increase in my humble view. With some better harness (like the PI that I discovered) I think this can be sightly better, but far from the 50%. I would say that if the increase in productivity decays over time, the amount of code generated I had to refactor and clean for most of the week.

But for sure the Claude was a huge disappointment, very bad quality for it’s price, and super slow for the needs of a “start up mindset”, let’s put in this way.

Most of my complains are on the func (f *thing) name(w *http.Writer...), this is ok for small functions, but when you have 20 lines, where 10 of then uses single letters around are unbearable.

Regarding the CLAUDE.md, didn’t work at all. I don’t know if the training material is so small in the GoLang that makes the model go crazy on specific details, or maybe the single letter was preferred since it consumes less tokens, either way, didn’t work at all. And I was using the Opus. I know that they released the Fable, but I can’t use since it’s coding related.

The Qwen model I used a quantized version of it for a lot of the stuff, it’s super fast, but a 8 vRAM won’t hold it. On my Linux box I have 16vRAM and managed to hold it tight, but I notice that I was destroying the GPU for long running tasks, so I aborted.

I do have a Blackwell in mind, with some luck I can manage to grab one and test a full precision DeepSeek V4 Flash in it. I already saw some people doing it in a single Blackwell, so should be a thing to have at home to play around, but this is a far future.

Edit: I did rewrote the post. Once I calmed my mind down I think it’s better now. At least my closed friends prefer this version of it.

That was really insightful.

And align with a close friend on the topic. So you know. I think I’ll rewrite this post in a less “aggressive” tone.

When two of my close friends don’t like a post, there is a good chance that the post isn’t good enough to leave the oven.

Very sorry to hear that. Would you mind elaborating on the topic? What was the issue? The language? The tone? The way that I described? English isn’t my mother language, and I want to improve how I do express myself in it.

Sad that some projects gets discontinued. Thanks for the link and reading the blog.