Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman


Yes, I can hear you, Clem Fandango!

  • 147 Posts
  • 12.6K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • Serkis admits it didn’t have the North American launch he was hoping for, sparking “outrage” over what people perceived to be its political leanings (“anti-capitalist” and “not anti-communist enough” were some of the critiques, he says) and struggling at the box office.

    Wow so he lost all the people who cared about the message of the book by dilluting it and still got shat on by people peddling McCarthy era scare tactics about communism and jerk off capitalism daily.

    But we wanted to debate and boy, did we get a debate in the States. It was from both left and right, and they each had their own particular reason for reviling it. It was criticized for being anti-capitalist. It was criticized for being not anti-communist enough. It seemed to do what we wanted it to do, which was cause a debate, but what it didn’t do was encourage parents to take their children to see it. It literally got something like 60 million hits on the first trailer — and of outrage. It was a very very strange outing.

    In the full quote from the interview he claims “the left and right both hated it” and then only mentions critiques from the right… Is it because the ones from the left are actually… good critiques? (like shocker no shit they are)





  • I sit down when I pee
    There’s nothing that crazy ‘bout me
    I’m just takin’ a whiz, mind your own biz
    Why is everybody always staring at me?

    Hey bro, I gotta go
    Let me through, I gotta go number two

    No can do, I’m taking a pee
    Sitting on the loo, having a good long wee

    Are you sitting down?

    I’m sitting down

    And you’re not making brown?

    I’m not making brown

    Are you making iced tea?

    Just lemonade

    But are you sitting down?

    I’m sitting down!

    Why don’t you stand like a regular man?
    Then you can pee in the urinal can

    If you really wanna know why I’m sitting strong
    I just can’t stand touching my dong






  • My point is a lot of those wouldn’t be possible without pre-existing policy.

    So much of what we knew only as bitter satire has been turned into policy by MAGA.

    My point is that I disagree with the idea that it was “bitter satire” that has been “turned into” policy by MAGA. Because they have decades of bad policy to lean on to help justify their Executive Orders. These things didn’t happen by chance, they’re purposefully exploiting holes in the system.

    Free speech zones go back to the 70s at least, and Obama expanded Secret Service powers for tightly controlling any event where a person with SS protection might be, including denial of free speech and ability to make arrests.

    When you made your comment, I was making a similar comment with a link to the ACLU talking about it and how it was worrisome in 2012. My point is that kind of policy that preexisting bad policy is what they are leaning on to make things worse. We don’t get to pretend this just happened by accident all at once when MAGA showed up.

    I say this because I was one of those people in the Bush era who was warning about the dangers of mass surveillance and was furious that the Democrats didn’t do more to dismantle it and look now, that massive surveillance network is increasingly privatized and increasingly used to control and dominate the populace, just like people like me fucking warned was a significant risk back in the early 2000s. It fucking sucks to be right that institutionalizing some of the worst aspects of Bush’s post-9/11 policies are exactly the things that have helped Trump amass and keep power.

    /rant




  • No, MAGA is honestly doing a lot of what Mamdani is doing just in reverse, using and exploiting existing policy to justify actions. Like how with the tariffs they claimed it was legal under one statute, and when the Supreme Court struck that down, they just used a different statute with slightly different rules, and kept the tariffs.

    MAGA has had actually very few real policy wins other than the Big Beautiful Bill. Most things they do are by Executive Order and use novel (read: bullshit) legal justifications for it.

    Mamdani is using on the books policy to help people. Trump is using on the books policy to strong arm people and force his decisions through any legal chicanery necessary.





  • Let’s be real though, technically software has always lived and died on licensing instead of ownership.

    I remember software in the 90s having limits on how many computers you could use an application on (however rarely enforced), and making backup copies of software that you owned (like copying a CD for backup purposes) was a hard fought right when the DMCA was being implemented. But even the backup only helped so much because especially in the last 20 years tech has grown at lightning speed since the introduction of the iPhone in 2007. A CD backup of Office 2003 isn’t really helpful in 2026 anyway.

    I’m not arguing this is how it should be. I’m just clarifying that technically this is how it has always been. We’ve never had full rights to do whatever we want with the software we buy. It’s why Free (as in speech, not as in beer) Open Source Software is so important, and why open hardware is so important by extension.

    The same companies that rose to dominance using an environment with weak regulation and enforcement while also maintaining that hacker attitude of “routing around bad legislation” have now been using their dominance to make an environment of tight regulation and enforcement, now that they’re at the top. They have spent endless amounts of lobbying money to get this environment to benefit them where you’re locked in via hardware and software to the companies rules on how you use your hardware and software… because the software was never really ours, and now they’re leveraging that to make our hardware not ours either.

    The only way out is through. FOSS.