what makes it false is the idea that she lost because she was a woman.

the numbers do not agree

it is a sexist point because it pushes the thought that democrats can not run female candidates if they want to win.

this is provably false, even considering misogyny. and like i said, is sourced from political operatives looking for a wedge. misogyny is just not that influential.

Harris was polling to win the election, up until the listed slights against the progressive base.

you can see that even within the democratic party a push to reaffirm conservative power by reassigning failures of the party on such things like inclusiveness, sexism, racism, ect. they attempted to hide the result of their internal investigation that counters their talking points.

it is also a thought terminating accusation with no one to blame and fights against progression in this regard. and should be shouted down when ever and where ever it crops up.

i reject this stance. the same thing is said about a black president. and women make up 50 % of the vote base.

especially since this is a talking point of operatives who seek a gender based wedge.

and also moot when there were a lot of issues whith both women candidates who were the democrats primary candidates in the last few presidential elections. these issues supersede all other reasons. the internal reports point to the backing of a genocide and aligning with establishment democrats, the ultra wealthy, and her “tough on crime” stance that is by design targeting minorities.

AND AND she lost by a narrow margin, male nominees have lost by FAR MORE then she did

do not accept such arguments

i have a issues with a couple of her stances, however, labeling her as a rhino would be news to me.

exactly what republican policies does she fight for?

I’m assuming this is way back when there was the isreal missile shield vote. MTG was part of the opposition to it, AOC basically argued it was purely defensive so we should back it. IMO that’s one of AOCs worse takes on a subject that I’ve seen, when otherwise I would say I like AOCs stances 95% of the time. -TheFogan

? the original post mentions AOC and MTG, the post i responded to is “ What is this referencing specifically, “taking MTG’s side over AOC’s”?”

i have no idea where Harris comes in other then she was also criticized rightfully for backing israel during a genocide.

ah, well fair enough. though getting any headway on this problem is going to be harder then muting an airport. data centers get anything they want in the end

is this just a new form of 5g causing cancer and also mind control? you can hate data centers for reasons that can be measured on gages.

i thought we were talking about AOC publicly backing giving arms to isreal. Harris would have been just as guilty as biden, as she said herself. would she have been as bad as trump ? of course not, which is why i voted for harris. but that does not mean she gets a pass, and neither does AOC. whomst we are actually talking about. and my main point being that her stance is hard to swallow. nothing more. i will be looking for someone better in the mean time

not sure how 4+1 is better then 5

ok? not sure how that makes doubling down on genocide ok but sure.

yes

not all issues are equal. backing genocide is a hard pill to swallow.

cool, but calling him a centrist, and everyone else nazi’s kinda flattens the data set to the point of uselessness

mine is not available until june

yea, like our last primary! … oh wait.

elves were pulled from someone’s ass

you can’t put a price on love

better now then the future, just like they would have been better even earlier, but thems the breaks

the US is not winning the war in iran.