Is this you, champ? https://piefed.social/c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world/p/2069906/an-ai-hate-wave-is-here

Calling him naive because you’re the one posting slop on the fediverse?

It’s because he made a website to rate the attractiveness of his co-eds.

He’s a website builder. That’s about it.

Post an example of the input file and you’ll have a shell script before you can say “shebang slash bin slash bash”

Another step towards eliminating anonymous payments and removing citizens’ ability to exist without being constantly tracked by the state.

Whilst I’m all for cash usage, who is paying for a house with cash?

Going by market-cap, you’re wrong, and also there’s a reason that I focussed on LLMs in my comment and that’s because I know that machine learning in general has lots of practical uses. This criticism was about LLMs and the current state of the AI industry.

The report that they take this data from is here:

https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/T218/reports/2026-dbir-data-breach-investigations-report.pdf

Are you really still falling for this bait? If you’re laughing at them you’re not fighting them.

I thought Denuvo was copy-protection. They do anti-cheat too? Really?

I don’t really understand how you can say both of these things at the same time:

I tried to do some research here, but I didn’t manage to find any conclusive articles or discussions on the matter.

and

As both dynamic and static linking in the EU is generally considered as a question of interoperability rather than derivative work, linking-wise virality of licenses like GPL are basically void over here.

If you can point to a law that specifically excludes dynamic linking as creating a derivative work then I’d be interested to see it, but surely that would count as a “conclusive discussion on the matter”!?

Note that countries in Europe do not use Common Law, so legal precedent is not as important as in Anglo-Saxon countries and that means that in every case the judge will have to inspect and interpret the relevant statutes.

Chrono what?

The enclosure of the commons. All of this has happened before. All of this will happen again.

The whole concept that allowing the free expression of objectionable ideas will allow them to be dissected and disproven in the cold light of public debate, has itself been disproven over and over for at least the past decade.

We live in a different era, where partisanship and propaganda are so powerful that there is no longer an authoritative voice that the general public trusts. The government is distrusted, the both-sides-BBC is distrusted, the broadsheets that turned into clickbait farms are distrusted.

We have to stop giving oxygen to fascists in the hope that people will just see how wrong they are. I don’t care what people attending this march really believe. What I care about is that people preaching hate should not have a platform, anywhere, under any circumstances.

No, and I’m tired of hearing legitimate and important criticisms of LLMs and the whole AI industry start with “There are things AI is good for but…”

There is so much wrong with this technology, how it was created, how it’s being pushed, how it’s being funded, how it affects us, and all of the necessary discussion is being pre-emptively watered down by this prevarication of critics, just to pander to the AI-brained robot-fuckers that can’t bear to hear that their favourite toy that allows them to role-play as being competent is just a piece of abusive shit designed to make us stupider and trap us in an endless dependency on the new oligarchs’ expensive infrastructure while giving them a convenient scapegoat for all of their malicious acts, propaganda and history rewriting.

There is nothing that LLMs are good for, and every time you make excuses for it, you’re tightening the noose around your own neck, and all of the people that come after us.

Well my boss told me to work hard. 🍆

Poe’s law.

And the reality is that it’s neither of those two that are to blame. We’re in recession and AI is just the convenient excuse to make layoffs without crashing the stock-price.

The real people who should be blamed are the ghouls who have been exploiting disaster-capitalism since at least the pandemic to concentrate all of the wealth in the hands of a few oligarchs. The politicians are all complicit.

It’s remarkable that these tools aren’t being immediately shut down. Imagine the reaction from police and government if it was any other piece of software or even a real human responding to people in this way.

Bullet hell is where enormous amounts of bullets are fired at the player by relatively few enemies, requiring lots of memorisation and twitch reaction skill to avoid the fast and complex patterns that fill the screen. It is intentionally extremely challenging. eg. https://youtu.be/zT-p6Ju67l4?t=976

Bullet heaven is where enormous amounts of enemies swarm a player who has ridiculous firepower to take out dozens of enemies at the same time, requiring little more than circle strafing and holding the fire button. It is intentionally casual, and the gameplay is about the RPG/roguelike upgrading aspect much more than the actual game mechanics. eg. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8TiJY3lXmQ

If you want a critical take of the difference between the two, and the direction of the games market from a shmup-fan’s perspective, I found this review by The Electric Underground really interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSS_3iTIgA4 (it obviously predates this Steam label change, so there is some hand-wringing about what is being classified as bullet-hell).

Additionally, doubling the diameter results in doubling the surface area to volume ratio which increases the percentage of the mass that survives atmosphere entry.