The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • @banneryear1868@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Studios basically want to own the personas of their actors so they can decouple the actual human from it and just use their images. There’s been a lot of weird issues with this already in videogames with body capture and voice acting, and contracts aren’t read through properly or the wording is vague, and not all agents know about this stuff yet. It’s very dystopian to think your whole appearance and persona can be taken from you and commodified. I remember when Tupac’s hologram performed at Coachella in 2012 and thinking how fucked up that was. You have these huge studios and event promoters appropriating his image to make money, and an audience effectively watching a performance of technological necromancy where a dead person is re-animated.

      • @Glytch
        link
        English
        209 months ago

        Who cares if his estate agreed to it? HE didn’t. His estate shouldn’t have the right to make money off of things he never actually did.

        Let the dead stay dead, it’s just an excuse to not pay new, living artists.

        • @hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          That’s literally how estates work.

          Once I’m 6 feet under, if it could give my family a better life I’d say they should be able to agree to whatever they want on my behalf as long as it doesn’t go against my will.

          • @Glytch
            link
            English
            49 months ago

            I know that legally they have the right. I’m saying they shouldn’t have that right because reanimating a digital facsimile of your corpse just to puppet it to make money is fucked up. This includes shit like the CG Tarkin and Leia in Star Wars as well as the Tupac hologram