Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?

@rimu@piefed.social

What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

Mass instance bans

Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

Done

Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

He has abused the modlog to claim ‘harassment’, which I have never engaged in. I have not even interacted with Rimu in any way for days prior to getting kicked from the PieFed developer Matrix channels.

He has decided to mass ban 20 users because they have spoken out against his erratic and hostile behaviour as of late.

  • Goferking0
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Unless you have more than the instance description fuck no

    • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      So then we try this again. Here is the claim, tell me whether you agree or disagree with this claim:

      If someone silences you because of your pro-trans views, any reasonable person would recognize that as being “anti-pro-trans”, or more simply “anti-trans”. Another way to say that is “transphobic”.

      • Goferking0
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        So you are claiming rimu is a transphobe and was silencing people now?

        • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          Let’s try again.

          Here is the claim, tell me whether you agree or disagree with this claim:

          If someone silences you because of your pro-trans views, any reasonable person would recognize that as being “anti-pro-trans”, or more simply “anti-trans”. Another way to say that is “transphobic”.

          Simple “agree” or “disagree”.

          • Goferking0
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            No the claim is you still deflecting.

            Again is there anything other than the instance description used?

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              13 days ago

              Again is there anything other than the instance description used?

              Yes there is, but you won’t answer this simple question that demonstrates it (of course we know why you won’t answer).

              But I’ll ask again, so you’re on the record as dodging again:

              Here is the claim, tell me whether you agree or disagree with this claim:

              If someone silences you because of your pro-trans views, any reasonable person would recognize that as being “anti-pro-trans”, or more simply “anti-trans”. Another way to say that is “transphobic”.

              Simple “agree” or “disagree”.

              • Goferking0
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Yes there is

                Then please present it.

                I love you are trying to make people sound like a transphobe

                • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Then please present it.

                  Happy to. But for it to be understood, one would need to agree to the broader claim I proposed above. Are you okay to move into the demonstration with the assumption that you agree with that broader claim? Or do we need to understand what you disagree with about it?

                  • Goferking0
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    So there isn’t anything else. Know this for 2 reasons. One you’d start with it and two you havent been able to stay coherent this entire time