This comic is part of an ongoing story that might make more sense with full context.

First comic in this story
Previous comic in this story
Next comic in this story

Please be advised that if you use the connect app, it doesn’t always correctly parse links to lemmy posts. If they’re not working for you, you can follow the whole plotline on my site. (These comics are in reverse chronological order, so start at the end and work backwards.)


It’s not really a “house” - It’s Kolat Towers. Kolat Towers is a pair of wizard towers surrounded by a small compound. There’s a lot of spare rooms.

  • AhdokOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    The idea that Konsi would kick someone out on the street is pretty far-fetched.

      • AhdokOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        In the previous comic, Addis mentioned that Konsi had “built and hallowed her own temple”

        What Konsi actually built is a lodge house for goblins within the city. Goblins who come and join her cause get to live there, while they’re given support and advice on integrating with Waterdeep society (lessons in common, teaching in the law, societal expectations of behaviour, regular baths, etc.) - There’s a shrine to Tymora in the lodge where regular services are held. It can house about 40 goblins.

        So… “Konsi’s home for wayward goblins” is… sort of a real thing. Most recently we used it to help rehome a tribe of kobold refugees (we sort of killed their dragon.)

    • uphillbothways@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That doesn’t mean Razira wouldn’t feel disadvantaged or pressured to react a certain way in the power dynamic. It doesn’t have to do with Konsi’s internal dialogue. This has been established for reason most commonly in lawsuits dealing with sexual harassment between supervisors and their reporting employees.

      • AhdokOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        First of all, Razira propositioned Konsi, Konsi hasn’t “pressured” her to do anything. Quite the opposite in fact, Konsi tried to talk her out of it at first.

        Secondly Razira’s a traveling paladin - she spends most of her time on the road, and only stops in the city occasionally, most days she camps on the road.

        Thirdly, both of them have a permanent home in the temple, nobody’s ever going to be “homeless”

        These things have all been established in the narrative of this comic already.



        Fourthly, Konsi isn’t Razira’s “landlord”. Razira doesn’t “pay rent”. They just live together.

        Fifthly, “my house” here is shorthand for a large compound that the adventurers own jointly. Razira is one of those owners as well.

        • figaro@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          It looks like the person asking the question here is speaking from a place of hurt and their own difficult personal experiences, which might have made them sensitive to things that remind them of something that happened to them.

          That said, it is extremely clear that there is nothing improper going on. Konsi would probably be 100% aware of some kind of improper relationship in the first place and wouldn’t let it happen.

          Anyway. Konsi anime when 😅

      • Marchioness
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Dude, this is a light-hearted cute comic about people falling in love. It’s not really an appropriate venue for accusing the author of romanticising sexual harassment in the workplace.

        • uphillbothways@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m not accusing her of doing that on purpose. I’m informing her that it reads that way to people who’ve been subject to similar situations in the past.

          • Marchioness
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            “I’m not accusing her of doing that on purpose” means you ARE accusing her of doing that, which is fucking ridiculous.

              • Marchioness
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                Oh I’m sorry, I don’t mean to say you accused her of doing that on purpose, I’m informing you that it reads that way to other people.

          • Marchioness
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            If your takeaway from this is that it’s “sexual harassment” then that’s a you problem.