The German parliament has backed a new law to allow the recreational use of cannabis.

Under the law, over-18s in Germany will be allowed to possess substantial amounts of cannabis, but strict rules will make it difficult to buy the drug.

Smoking cannabis in many public spaces will become legal from 1 April.

Possession of up to 25g, equivalent to dozens of strong joints, is to be allowed in public spaces. In private homes the legal limit will be 50g.

Already police in some parts of Germany, such as Berlin, often turn a blind eye to smoking in public, although possession of the drug for recreational use is illegal and can be prosecuted. 

Use of the drug among young people has been soaring for years despite the existing law, says Health Minister Karl Lauterbach, who is instigating the reforms.

  • Gutless2615
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sigh . No. Access to cannabis hasn’t led to more burnouts.

    • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m speaking from a position of direct evidence. It’s caused issues in my region. More children are being caught with THC than before legalization and the proliferation of dispensaries in my state. And its not even close. We’ve called the ambulance to the school this year once already for a 7th grader getting too high and having a panic attack from their THC laced vape pen. Academic ineligiblity lists have increased year over year for a decade as well. There’s other factors at play too like their family’s finances, social media, covid, etc. but well over half of the list I know have been caught getting high in and out of school.

      And again, I want to reiterate. I support legalization and also use marijuana. But its proven that marijuana use before the brain is fully developed can disrupt proper development. And that can be as late as 25 years old though I support a legal age of 21.

      • Gutless2615
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re speaking from anecdotal evidence at best.

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 months ago

            So, I live in Canada, I haven’t seen more burnouts or other issues that were said to be associated with weed. Quite the opposite anecdotally speaking.

            Neither have the states who legalised or Uruguay for that matter.

            I don’t know what data you actually have, but it doesn’t seem sound.

            Care to share your source? (not asking for your dealer, I have a good one myself)

      • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        You made a claim about “more burnouts”, and when challenged decided to list every problem you could think of with weed instead of admitting you have no evidence for more burnouts.

        You also appear to be conflating consequences associated with prohibition, such as academic ineligibility, with the effects of the actual drug. The point of decriminalizing is to stop ruining people’s lives over a drug.

        • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          What do you think happens to students that are failing their classes semester after semester? They eventually drop out of school and go for a GED. And of course im not going to provide “evidence”. I cited regional issues with the advent of greater availability. In order to provide direct evidence, I would need to link a very specific study (which wouldn’t exist) or I would need to break FERPA laws and provide access to the academic ineligiblity lists. So no. That’s not an option.

          You also appear to be conflating consequences associated with prohibition, such as academic ineligibility, with the effects of the actual drug.

          I’m not sure what you mean? These students are ineligible to participate in after school activities like sports because they’re failing their classes, not because they’re being punished for cannabis use. There’s correlation between behavioral issues, academic performance, and regular cannabis use. Correlation ≠ causation but it is still a discussion worth having.

          Now for about the 3rd time, I have no problem with weed. I support recreational legalization and further study for it’s use in medicine. It would make my life a whole hell of a lot easier and reduce the amount of opioids flowing through pharmacies, but there’s aspects of control that I think we should analyze and address.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            How do you know any of these issues are attributed solely to weed? Kids could be failing their classes and smoking weed because their parents beat the shit out of them on a regular basis. I’m sure these kids also drink water so there is definitely some correlation between water usage and kids failing their classes.

            • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I never attributed their failing grades solely to weed. I actually did the opposite and mentioned a few other environmental factors that may also be at play. If you can’t zoom out for just a fucking second and come to the conclusion that increased consumption of cannabis amung teens (which is fact) MAY have something to do with falling grades in teens, then in my opinion you’re being just as naive as politicians and civilians that want to keep weed as a schedule I drug.