• @kartonrealista@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    111 months ago

    “What I’m asking them to do is change their lifestyle three times a day,” he explained. “It’s not like supporting gay, women’s or civil rights, where all they have to do is stop discriminating.”

    “There aren’t that many people willing to listen to this kind of presentation because it doesn’t leave them indifferent,” he said. “It’s not something you just do casually, like your typical TED talk.”

    Even in his own view of himself he isn’t well received and his views are controversial and difficult to accept.

    • @kicksystem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      So? Does that proof him wrong?

      Here you have a holocaust survivor who compares what the Nazis did to the jews to what we do to animals in factory farms and slaughterhouses. His words. Never does he equate a cow to a Jew, but he recognizes that both are living breathing beings who don’t want to suffer and who want to live. He gets that it is hard for you to accept that, because if you would fully accept it you would probably have to give up consuming animal products in order to not feel like a massive hypocrite. Is he wrong though?

      • @kartonrealista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        So? Does that proof him wrong?

        No. It makes him an absolute minority and not representative of the general demographic of Holocaust survivors. Which was my point.

        You can find black people who are white supremacists, women who say universal suffrage was a mistake, any group can have people who have fringe positions, even ones that denigrate them. Finding a guy who believes what you believe but belongs to a discussed demographic is tokenism and has no place in any serious discussion.

        • @kicksystem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Fair enough. But sometimes a minority can be right and a majority can be wrong. That is why we understand arguments based on number of believers to be a fallacy. So are you saying that this guy’s comparison makes no sense? Or are you just making an argumentum ad populum?

          Furthermore, Dr. Alex Hershaft isn’t some whacko fringe lunatic. He’s had a pretty impressive career. Please just listen to what he has to say and I’d be happy to hear if you have any substantial counter argument to the comparisons he draws.