Not sure if this was already posted.

The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist’s views and intentions.

Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not if it was an exhibit about misogyny…

    You are so eager to be a victim you have deliberately missed the point. Poor men.

    • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not if it was an exhibit about misogyny…

      I don’t believe you, but ok.

      You are so eager to be a victim you have deliberately missed the point.

      Lol. That’s ironic coming from you.

      Poor men.

      Imagine if I said the same thing about women. Would probably get my comment removed, haha.

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        You don’t believe the entire artwork was about misogyny? Talk about woosh

        The art clearly worked well, since you’re outraged

        • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t believe that he wouldn’t be upset.

          Talk about woosh

          Jeez, more irony from ya’ll.

          since you’re outraged

          Lol. Any criticism is ‘outrage’ in your mind.

          • jeffw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            You made an alt account to comment on this thread bud, someone here pissed you off and I believe it was that guy