• Doom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Article uses no names just people close to Biden

    🥱

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, that’s how reporting with anonymous sources works. The person writing the article knows who they are and verified that they’re “close to Biden”. You just have to determine whether you think the author is just making it all up.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Let’s say you’re a journalist. You have an in with Antony Blinken and, let’s say, Karine Jean-Pierre. They both want to tell you the same thing, and you want to report it. You know they are valid sources, but you and they both know there would be HUGE blowback (personally and professionally) if they were attributed by name.

          What’s your alternative, and how realistic is that?

            • spongebue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Perhaps, but maybe a rumor that should be taken more seriously than what your weird neighbor down the street says.

              Yes, it could be made up bullshit still but then you can look at the journalist themselves. Where do they work? Do you trust that source? Why or why not?

      • Doom
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not really journalism. Skepticism if anything.