• Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a fair point.

    My concern is they did nothing until the child porn came to light and then they added it.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No clue but I’m intrigued. This is could he a solid example of the police problem.

        It’s like they knew about it and did nothing.

        • Bizarroland@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And what they should do is throw him right in federal pound you in the ass prison. The fact that you get fired after that should be absolutely secondary to the main issue.

          • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Rule 1 reminder: Real-life decorum is expected. Please don’t say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

            Specifically, prison rape is a human rights problem, not a joke.

            • Bizarroland@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean, I understand where you’re coming from and you can sanction or down vote me for this but when it comes to pedophiles I don’t really feel like any decorum is warranted, and in my not so humble opinion that goes double for pedophile police officers.

              I will be much more cautious about that in the future though

              • jeremy@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Remember, not everyone who is accused IS guilty. A fifteen year old kid can be charged with producing child pornography for sending Richard Pics to someone, or even just TAKING them.
                And somewhere there is probably a priest who never touched a kid but was accused. Maybe.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            He has to be convicted first.

            Most likely it’s a state crime he’s being charged with. State prisons are much worse than federal Prisons.

            I don’t want prisons to be shitholes but they are and if convicted he’ll learn why we need reform in our prison sentence.