• LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The worst part is, he isn’t even American. Imagine if Americans would go into a foreign country and try to influence the elections… Oh wait.

  • Forbo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If this is illegal, does that mean Cards Against Humanity’s recent voting stunt is also?

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Rich people feel like they can do anything they want and usually the law lets them do so. I hope he faces some type of punishment for this.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Though maybe some of the other things Musk was doing were of murky legality, this one is clearly illegal. See 52 U.S.C. 10307(c): “Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register or vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both…” (Emphasis added.)

    I mean, if it’s clearly illegal then can we, you know, apply the law?

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Apparently nothing. I live in PA and want to sign up, but I really don’t want Musk to have my email or phone number or home address.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Understandable. I’d greatly consider it (if I didn’t already turn in my mail-in ballot, and he offered to California) but the idea alone that I’d be giving my private info to “I am a massive fascist and enabler and funder of them” just so I can grift a grifter.

        But the simple fact that even if I could give them what they demanded for payment, they would probably see a disabled, queer, poor person and go “Oh, well, you’re one of them so… Face the wall.”

        I’d rather be a poverty-trapped queer in a red county as I am now, than sell my morals for money. That’s what people with the moral backbone of a chocolate eclair do.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Put him behind bars for that and I start believing that the government takes this vote seriously.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m going to lower the bar:

      If the government issues any sort of indictment in the next 3 weeks, I’ll agree that they are taking it seriously. Even without bail.

    • Bertz@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s not actually illegal. He is paying a lottery to people who register to vote. Similarly, Cards Against Humanity is paying people who didn’t vote last election to make a voting plan.

      It’s illegal to pay someone to vote regardless of if it’s for a side. Neither instance goes far enough to be considered against the law as written. Cards Against Humanity states that it shouldn’t be and it’s fucked up that it is.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        You need to really read what CAH says… it’s only paying you to apologize, make a plan to vote and post a comment about Trump on social media. Nome of that goes as far as this lottery.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Has been for centuries. Rules rarely applied to the leaders of Rome or China, as soon as someone noticed the trend, it was the end of those governments until it was time to reform and try again.

      If you have enough money to have sway in your community or kingdom, you have enough money to start asking for favors and benefits. “I’ll give you this land, you give me something later.” “If I can guarantee enough grain for the next month, I can get a guarantee from you soon.”

      You put someone into any power over others, someone wants that power, and some people are willing to do anything for that power.

  • gargamel@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I mean, I guess I would take a million dollars from a deluded billionaire, but I would still vote for Harris.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Blatantly illegal.

    But Biden won’t step up and make Garland do his job.

    Just throw it on top of the giant piles of reason “not trump” isn’t enough to fight fascism.

    We need people actually willing and able to fight, best case scenario for Biden is he’s only one of those things.

    And as president, he’s clearly able to direct the DOJ, if he believes he shouldn’t be able, that makes him unwilling to fight fascism.

    • Fluba@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Just curious, why do you think Biden has to do anything? There’s teams of people in charge of enforcing laws that don’t need the president to tell them what to do. A CEO doesn’t tell everyone under him what to do. He just expects them to do their job to the best they’re able.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Because I know who Merrick Garland is and have observed his behavior over the last four years?

        It’s legit one of the few areas I agree with Biden:

        In recent weeks, President Biden has grumbled to aides and advisers that had Garland moved sooner in his investigation into former President Donald Trump’s election interference, a trial may already be underway or even have concluded, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss private matters. That trial still could take place before the election and much of the delay is owed not to Garland but to deliberate resistance put up by the former president and his team.

        https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/09/white-house-frustration-with-garland-grows-00140813

        Although I disagree with Biden on his path forward. Rather than replace Garland, his plan is to grumble to aids and adversers that Garland doesn’t do what he wants, I believe Biden should have never appointed him in the first, and can offer no plausible explanation for why he hasn’t been replaced other Biden is (say it with me) unwilling to fight fascism as hard as it needs to be fought.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            What?

            You want me to drop a specific name?

            If you really want me to I can look at the DOJ top chain of command and find at least one that seems willing to do their job if you really wanted, but I’m not sure why you’d expect me to have a list of candidate prepared for you.

            Do you want me to see if they have time for mock interviews too?

            I could name drop it’s for you if you think it’ll help, but frankly I’m worried no one will reach back out…

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      12 hours ago

      musk is all in. He either goes to prison or trump wins.

      I’m sure investigation starts immediately, but it won’t get results until after the election.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        musk is all in. He either goes to prison or trump wins.

        If trump has proven anything, it’s that wealthy Republicans can get away with literally anything in this country. Musk isn’t going to prison, and I doubt he’ll even see a courtroom over this.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Seriously… Trump staged a literal insurrection and is the top presidential candidate. They think Musk is going away for some voter bribery?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        What investigation is needed?

        There’s no way this is legal, it’s what “blatantly illegal” means.

        Like, if someone stripped naked, got a full automatic gun and walked around the White House busting off caps, it’s “blatantly illegal” no investigation needs to be done.

        This isn’t like Musk went home and put pants on, he’s still running around literally everyday till the election doing this.

        You stop the person from committing the crime, and lock them up if there’s reasonable suspicion they’ll keep committing crimes.

        Then when you’ve stopped more crimes from happening, you investigate the crimes that already blatantly happened, as well as looking for others.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Are you suggesting to lock musk up for up to a year without a jury convicting him? For an illegal lottery.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            You know, they do that to people every single day.

            They hold people (remanded into custody) until a trial if they are a threat to the public.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            That rich people be held to the law!!!

            Reginald! Get the fainting couch, I need to go get my pearls so I may clutch them

            • vxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              25
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Honestly, it sounds so bad it would proof the trump campaign right.

                • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  I’m wondering if people are confused about your comment because they are missing the fact that Musk is literally an African American (American now, originally from Africa).

              • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                Right about what, exactly? You do know this is a random person talking out of their ass on the internet about how they want the justice system to work, not reality.

                Have no fear, there would be an investigation and a jury and conviction before Musk is behind bars (LOL JUST KIDDING, Musk is rich and will never face consequences)

                • vxx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  22
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  Right about the radical left wanting to imprison political opponents. Without due process

                  Over an illegal lottery that could be argued to be a sweep