• Brocken40@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your missing the point, how can you know that if professionals can’t study it? They are blocking the ability of Texas institutes from studying this!

    • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should we let every potentially (or even verifiably) unsafe piece of software to operate freely on government networks? No, we shouldn’t, even if it’s in the name of research. Knowingly running spyware on a government network isn’t a good idea.

      Precautions need to be taken, perhaps via cooperation between network operators and researchers, to assure that having unsafe software on their network is not potentially harmful to other users of the network.

      Also, again, not every college in Texas is a state college. In fact, I think the vast majority aren’t state colleges. They aren’t subject to any of this regulation anyway.

      • Brocken40@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        On college campus networks yes. How would you have a Java class without allowing unverified software to run on the schools network?

        And just because it’s state schools now we should be extra worried, the Texas gop has been working to systematically disassemble all avenues of public education, the ability of colleges to college needs to be protected

        • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          How would you have a Java class without allowing unverified software to run on the schools network?

          I said unsafe software. I specifically said spyware. If you’re caught running malicious Java code on the network, you’ll be reprimanded. If you’re running known malicious apps by Big (Ad)Tech, you should also be reprimanded.

          And just because it’s state schools now we should be extra worried, the Texas gop has been working to systematically disassemble all avenues of public education

          If they were to completely cut all funding to public education, it’s the state schools that would disappear. Private schools, who already are not affected by this ban, would be fine.

          • Brocken40@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Only having private schools is a bad thing.

            the limitation of public schools to perform studies on par with private institutes is bad. It should be prevented to preserve avenues to higher education.

          • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re running known malicious apps by Big (Ad)Tech, you should also be reprimanded.

            first off that’s not the case right now and there is no proposal in government to do such a thing. Second, what evidence is there that TikTok is capable of being of any harm to the network compared to standard software like M$ Windows or just general bootleg software? If a ban is warranted, which I don’t believe it is, it should be applied properly and not singling out that one app you personally don’t like.