• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    The burning of qurans is clearly meant to incite hate and violence though, and frankly people shouldn’t be burning anything in public anyways.

    They’re still perfectly free to invite anyone to their backyard book burnings, don’t act like this is some authoritarian limit on freedom, this is an active intervention to PRESERVE freedom from the nazis who want to take it from us.

    • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I do not approve of burning holy books, but I think it should be legal.

      What people shouldn’t do and what should be banned are different things. I don’t want to live in a place where what is not mandatory is banned. There has to be some room for freedom of expression, even for people expressing ideas we dislike.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I do not approve of burning books, full stop. I couldn’t care less whose imaginary friend the book is or isn’t about.

        But I completely agree that the government should categorically not be legislating which books you can and cannot burn. Burning a book is a form of free speech. It’s often offensive to many people, but it’s still important - if for no other reason than it lets the people doing the burning show their true colors.

        • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Burning a book is a form of free speech. It’s often offensive to many people, but it’s still important - if for no other reason than it let’s the people doing the burning show their true colors.

          Yes! That’s something I have also thought about. When some angry folks burned the rainbow flag this summer, I was unhappy that they did, but glad that they showed their intolerance publicly so that we can learn about who they are.

        • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. People can burn anything they want in their backyard. Just keep out of public spaces

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it remains legal, you just can’t do it in public.

        Feel free to buy a cartload of qurans to use for your backyard barbeques.

      • Syndic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        There has to be some room for freedom of expression, even for people expressing ideas we dislike.

        And there still is plenty of room of public expression of opinions without burning a book representing a religious group. Seriously there are thousands of ways to do so.

        But European countries did learn some lessons and that’s why some actions such as calling for religious or other minority groups to be killed or to intimindate such groups with displays of violence isn’t allowed in many of them. And burning a religious book in public is such an act of intimidation which serves absolutely no constructive purpose. That’s why many European countries don’t allow such behaviour.

        • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You act like there would be less of a reaction if people ripped up, walked on, or in other ways desecrated the Quran. This isn’t about book burning, this is about a group of people not tolerating that on of their symbols is desecrated.

          Imagine if we prosecuted people for burning flags or signs with slogans… but maybe you think that should be illegal as well?

        • Fifteen_Two@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doyou care if I burn a stack of paper? Then you shouldn’t care if I burn a fucking book.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            I certainly care if you burn a stack of paper in the middle of the street, there’s no good reason to do it and it’s a public danger.

            • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Okay, people will rip the holy book of the week instead. You may not have a good reason to do it, but others should be free to do so.

        • taladar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          that’s why some actions such as calling for religious or other minority groups to be killed or to intimindate such groups with displays of violence isn’t allowed in many of them

          Then why are you giving groups who threaten violence an incentive to do that more often by giving in to their demands?

          • Syndic@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            So we now should base our laws only on doing the opposite of what a few lunatics demand regardless on how it will affect a lot more people? I really don’t think so.

          • brainrein@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, rightwing people have proved over and over again that they’re willing to not only burn books but to burn people.

            • taladar@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So we should make action A by right-wing people illegal because they are known to do action B?

            • blujan@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Buddy, the people getting angry over the quran burnings are also right wing. They indeed have shown they are willing to burn people.

              I just think we shouldn’t tolerate intolerance, from christians or muslims alike.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it should be allowed in any way anything else can be burned in public by an individual. If a group or organization is burning stuff I think its fine to put limits. That being said I don’t think individuals should have a lot of rights to set things ablaze in public. If someone wants to sell a chimney sweep koran or toilet paper with suras it should be fine though but hey no reason it can’t be bibles and verses or flags and pictures of politicians or whatever. Its crass and such but really the people being offended should just tit for tat it and make their own crass thing or whatever.