Everyone knows the tale of Brand X getting bought out by some faceless global conglomerate and going to shit, but does the opposite ever happen?

  • harmonea@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is the difference, in your mind, between changing owners and buying out a company?

    To me they’re the same thing and this is an appropriate reply for OP. Is it just a matter of scale for you? (I think we’d all like bigger examples, but this still works)

    • Ringo13@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I definitely think the original post meant things like retail stores, social media platforms, nationwide chain restaurants, etc

      • harmonea@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure, but that was just additional context for my question, which was what this poster feels is the difference between changing owners and buying out a company.

        • Ringo13@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re thinking of changing owners vs buying a corporate company with a CEO. Yeah they’re similar lol but not really what the post is asking for on here

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The context provided in the question is of big companies buying smaller companies and ruining them. OP asked if “the opposite ever happens”, which I interpret to mean a big corporation buying a smaller company and it NOT going to shit.

      Sure we can talk about any change in ownership whatsoever, but that seems like a complete change in topic with an obvious answer.