• EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    That makes me want to use firefox less.

    I don’t need a nanny-control to tell me what’s fake and what’s real.

    • ClaraBecker@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sifting through reviews to find real criticism is tedious. I never asked for this feature expecting it to become a reality, but I won’t turn my nose at time saved at 0 expense. As long as it isn’t used for marketing or fingerprinting, what’s the issue? Note: I might be missing your sarcasm, I’m tired.

    • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This has the same energy as someone who says they want to drive a car less because it has seatbelts installed.

      Like fine - its a useful tool that might prevent you being scammed which just displays information you can easily ignore- better run away.

      • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        This has the same energy as someone who says they want to drive a car less because it has seatbelts installed.

        A seatbelt is an actual safety device that works and isn’t being controlled by some other company.

        That’s not the same thing.

    • Doug7070@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Then you can ignore/turn it off? It’s also a function to protect users from malicious online behavior, dunno how that could be interpreted as a nanny, unless you also insist browsers shouldn’t warn you when accessing known malware links or similar. If you really insist on having the absolute freedom to not be advised about it when you’re being scammed then go off I guess.