• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know because I made less than $100k when I bought my house for about the same as in this example.

    Good for you, but most single mothers couldn’t afford to do that and your “evidence” is purely anecdotal. I’m guessing you live somewhere with very low property prices and/or susidized childcare if you’re indeed a single mom.

    Most people shouldn’t be homeowners

    Says who? What gives you the right to determine whether people should be allowed to own their home rather than be rent gouged for their entire adult lives?

    making it tougher to secure funding is a good thing

    It sure as hell isn’t! See the aforementioned rent gouging. In the roughly 20 years since moving from my parents’ homes, I’ve paid several times more in rent than a decent house or condo plus taxes would have cost.

    Because I never had and probably never WILL have that much at the same time, either up front or through a loan, though, I’m going to pay more for modest apartments over my lifetime without ever owning one than rich people pay for a very nice house. It’s called a poor tax and it’s not a fair or otherwise good thing.

    prevents housing crashes.

    No it doesn’t. Housing crashes are caused by real estate speculation going wrong, not poor people owning their homes.

    The sunprime mortgage crisis wasn’t about poor people getting loans. It was about banks and other financial institutions gambling with the ownership of that debt and other overvalued assets until the jenga tower inevitably toppled.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good for, but most single mothers couldn’t afford to do that and your “evidence” is purely anecdotal

      Forgot to address this, but it’s not anecdotal that someone with X income can afford a mortgage at Y+X. That’s math.

      Assuming good credit, which literally anyone can have on a long enough timetable, the money just doesn’t work the way you think it does.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        good credit, which literally anyone can have on a long enough timetable

        That’s categorically false. There’s tens of millions of Americans literally stuck in crushing poverty no matter what they do or don’t do. Just because you’ve been luckier than that doesn’t mean that your experience is universal.

        the money just doesn’t work the way you think it does.

        Right back at you.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol I love when kids from rich families LARP like they know what being poor looks like.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wtf are you on about? I’m not from a rich family and I’ve never been anywhere near rich myself either. Almost certainly never will be.

            You’re the one who claims that anyone can achieve a good credit score, which is a delusion shared by people who have never been poor and poor people who mistakenly think that they’re temporarily embarrassed multimillionaires.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Having a good credit score just requires you to

              A) have any credit

              B) make monthly payments

              C) don’t get evicted

              Literally anyone can do that on a long enough timeline. I didn’t pay my student loans at all for 5 solid years and brought my credit score up from roughly my age to 700+ in like 4 years just by making payments. I did this while making 36k/year, with a baby, as a single parent

              Idk why you’re so dead set on pretending having credit is impossible. The problem with these assumptions from you people is that some of us are the people you’re talking about so patronizingly.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Again pretending that your experience is universal and that inescapable expenses exceeding income isn’t a thing that happens to tens of millions.

                Since we’ve come to the stage where you just repeat bullshit that I’ve already refuted, I’m gonna stop wasting my time on you. Have the day you deserve.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Says who?

      The amount of georgraphical space in the areas in which people want to live.

      Condo owners, sure.

      The sunprime mortgage crisis wasn’t about poor people getting loans. It was about banks and other financial institutions gambling with the ownership of that debt and other overvalued assets until the jenga tower inevitably toppled.

      Ludicrously lax mortgage loaning guidelines were the cause of that toxic debt. If you weren’t an adult at the time you should watch The Big Short. Actually even if you were, because it’s also just a good movie.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The amount of georgraphical space in the areas in which people want to live. Condo owners, sure.

        First of all, I never said that home ownership had to be single family houses. That was YOUR assumption.

        Second of all, while I agree as a general rule that it’s better to conserve space by building more dense residential properties, most liveable land is hoarded by rich people. Confiscating the unneeded land of rich people to build affordable housing is one of the few if not the only legitimate application of eminent domain laws.

        Ludicrously lax mortgage loaning guidelines were the cause of that toxic debt

        No, ludicrously draconian enforcement when people missed a single payment was what made it toxic. The banks being stuck with a bunch of unpaid small mortgages would never had caused anywhere near as much damage as what ACTUALLY happened.

        If you weren’t an adult at the time you should watch The Big Short

        I was and I have. The big short isn’t about how poor people shouldn’t get loans. It’s about how banks shouldn’t give poor people loans with predatory terms and then gamble the entire economy on defaulted on debt and other junk assets bundled as prime assets becoming worth more.

        Actually even if you were, because it’s also just a good movie

        Finally something we 100% agree on 😁

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          most liveable land is hoarded by rich people

          Most livable land is not desirable because it’s rural. You can buy a house in a rural part of my state for 80k. You won’t, because it isn’t desirable.

          My in-laws’ home would sell for a whopping 120k right now if you wanna live in a town of 300 in rural Wisconsin.

          It’s about how banks shouldn’t give poor people loans with predatory terms

          It’s the same picture.

          No, ludicrously draconian enforcement when people missed a single payment was what made it toxic

          Banks did everything they could to keep people in homes because repossessed homes weren’t selling. My dad didn’t pay his mortgage for almost 2 years lol.

          something we agree on

          It is a really great flick/book, for sure.