dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-210 months agoIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govexternal-linkmessage-square97linkfedilinkarrow-up1600arrow-down114cross-posted to: vegan@lemmy.world
arrow-up1586arrow-down1external-linkIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govdwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-210 months agomessage-square97linkfedilinkcross-posted to: vegan@lemmy.world
minus-squaremerrickal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down10·10 months agoStrange that YTubers have to announce if they’re a sponsored video but sponsored scientists don’t.
minus-squareSocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·10 months agoRead the end of any research paper and it indicates any possible conflicts of interest. Youtube isn’t a reliable source.
minus-squareentwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·10 months agoThey usually disclose their funding in the journal article. Otherwise, this meta analysis wouldn’t be possible.
Strange that YTubers have to announce if they’re a sponsored video but sponsored scientists don’t.
Read the end of any research paper and it indicates any possible conflicts of interest. Youtube isn’t a reliable source.
They usually disclose their funding in the journal article. Otherwise, this meta analysis wouldn’t be possible.