• nomecks@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    8 个月前

    I wonder if this is how scholars reacted to the printing press

    • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 个月前

      Independently of what your position to vibe-coding or LLMs are: Vibe coding just isn’t any programming paradigm. A programming paradigm describes the structure of the program, often on a grammatical (programming language) level (e.g. declarative vs imperative). While “Vibe Coding” can lead to using one or the other paradigm, but is not a paradigm itself, it’s a tool to achieve that, similar as using an IDE with code-completion to generate code.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 个月前

      You’d have a point if this was an artist community, but coding AI as it exists does not work that well.

      I’d give a better example, but most of the technologies that didn’t actually work are lost to history. Hmm, maybe reapeating crossbows and that giant 40-reme boat that the one Greek king built?