I’ve seen that some instances have already done it preemptively.

  • Gray@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I, for one, vote in support of defederation from Threads. No reason to allow Meta to use our content to boost engagement on their for-profit platform. And pull users away from places like Lemmy at that.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see anyone here arguing that this instance should remain federated with Threads. So far it’s unanimous that we should defederate from them. I agree. We should keep this separate.

  • TheWaterGod@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of us just left a site because it was ruined by corporate greed. I don’t think corporations belong in the fediverse. If there’s a vote, I vote for defedding with Threads.

  • jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are the objectives of defederating?

    To protect our data? They can create stealth instances and get the same data. I think we have to accept and be mindful that the things we share on the fediverse can be exploited by people we don’t like.

    To exclude their users? I understand they have partnered with Namecheap to offer users customized instances with their own domain. Is it even a technical possibility to exclude all their users’ instances?

    To make a statement? Okay, but then we need to do more than just defederate.