I never click on them and I don’t consume any other content related to those countries but every so often I’ll see an anti (those countries) headline in my feed and then the next few days will have pro occupied China stories

It feels like targeted propaganda since I never see good stories about the other countries and it makes me wonder why YouTube hasn’t been broken up if they are too big to monitor that

  • pensa@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see this “drives engagement” claim all the time and at first glance it makes sense. But why would they do things like remove recommendations completely for users without watch history turned on? That is the exact opposite of driving engagement.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They need watch history to be able to track different metrics about you so it’s a gamble to make people that are used to relying on those recommendations to turn it back on. And they don’t remove recommendations completely, just from the home page as far as I know. I don’t use YouTube native client.

      • pensa@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guarantee that they still keep everyone’s watch history whether they consent or not. Facebook has been building shadow profiles on people for years. It’s reasonable to surmise that all major tech companies do the same. They simply removed the usefulness for the user but they still keep and profit from it for themselves.

        Anecdotally, before they removed recommendations for not having a watch history I would still need to create new accounts on occasion due to being locked into the same recommendations based on my watch history. Even though I opted out of watch history from the time of account creation.