• PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    They looked lile normal people without makeup. If they got dirt on their skin, they cleaned it up and despite not taking baths and showers all the time most people had a daily cleaning routine where they would comb their hair, clean themselves with cold water and a cloth and just generally take care of themselves.

    Bruh, the Norse are condemned by English chroniclers for having the lewdness and vanity to comb their hair regularly and bathe once a week; something which was regarded as making them appealing even to noblewomen.

    Much of Medieval Europe was in a pretty degraded state.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, they overcorrected from “all historic people were gorgeous and healthy unless the opposite serves the story” all the way to “even the huddled masses were fastidious about personal hygiene before the very concept was widely known” 😄

    • XM34@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Again difference between “cleaning” and “bathing” and the difference in the combing is that the norseMEN were combing their hair. Combing is absolutely unnecessary when you have short hair and no beard, which was the style for most central European peasants, but not the style of the norsemen. So yes, peasant women did absolutely conb their long hair, peasant men not so much. Which was the perfect source for idiotic bias that chroniclers needed to condemn the invading norsemen.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Chroniclers writings cannot be taken at face value entirely. Not saying it’s entirely false, however it cannot be taken as generalization of medieval culture.