Here is a link to this AP News article with the ads and email address requests removed.

This is a link to the paper’s abstract.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The more I learn about dolphin communication, the less eager I am to call it “completely non-linguistic” instead of “proto-linguistic”. They’re even able to understand subject and object in SOV, I remember an experiment using signs like:

    • ball plank put - the dolphin places the ball over the plank
    • plank ball put - the dolphin tries to place the plank over the ball

    And baby talk is a type of register - the speaker is actively changing his speech because of the situation (the hearer, in this case). It’s rather surprising to find it in another animal species than ours.

    • SirElliott@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suspect (and seem to recall reading) that the exaggerated pronunciations and pitch changes of baby talk may help aid children in language acquisition. For some other social animals that heavily rely on vocalizations to communicate, like dolphins, perhaps they do so for a similar reason?

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is just conjecture, but:

        It’s possible that it helps [proto-]language acquisition, but I feel like babytalk might also directly help the adult speaker. I’m saying that because plenty people use a babytalk-like register to address pets, that won’t benefit from it.

        Perhaps the usage of babytalk reduces the cognitive burden associated with changing your behaviour to a way that is suitable for the presence of children nearby?