I saw this post titled “Scratch a anti-harm reductionist and a fascist bleeds” (https://lemmy.world/post/33320759)

I commented that “harm reduction” apparently means sending billions in weapons to israel while they commit genocide and shutting down campus protests speaking out against that genocide. I said that seemed pretty fascist to me.

Within an instant, they downvoted my post and banned me. Guess it’s my fault for posting in a circlejerk community, but I’m still scratching my head on how that makes me a tankie. Something tells me this mod would be calling in the tanks to suppress any dissent if they could.

  • goat@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communityEnglish
    35·
    11 months ago

    Davel, who is an admin, does the exact same and is in this very thread.

    • FelixCress@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      6·
      11 months ago

      I can’t comment since I haven’t seen any bans by him. Not sure how it is relevant here either.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          61·
          11 months ago

          Ok, clearly not acceptable. But I still don’t see much relevance to this thread?

          • goat@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communityEnglish
            26·
            11 months ago

            I’m just making sure you agree that Davels isn’t an ideal moderator too

            • FelixCress@lemmy.worldBanned from community
              6·
              11 months ago

              I glanced over and I am finding his views much more concerning.

              Still that is really not relevant. I am sure there is plenty of crap moderators out there. I am finding PugJesus particularly bad after revenge ban in unrelated community after an argument in completly different community. He should be removed straight away after that.

                • FelixCress@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                  4·
                  11 months ago

                  Thanks, I believe it was the right decision. Funnily enough, I don’t have many issues with PugJesus views at all. It is his moderation which is a problem.

                  Pretty much opposite to the other example you gave where I have major issues with this person views. His moderation merely follows this ideological pattern, that’s all.