• Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    Plus these things used a fresnel lens to make the image as big as it was, which meant that you had to sit in exactly the right spot to be able to even see anything. It’s like how VR headsets are blurry and dim if you’re not wearing them properly; same issue with these TVs.

    And then there’s the fact that they would get dimmer and dimmer over time (within 5-10 years), which surely didn’t help matters much. Honestly you were much better off with a CRT over one of these old rear-projection TVs back in the day.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah but I don’t know anybody who actually did that. Most people get a new TV every 5-10 years anyway, and by then, plasmas were affordable and widely available.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          There were also…I remember a certain class of rear projection TVs from around the turn of the century that were a lot more compact than the gigantic box type from the 90’s. Similar technology but just not as boxy, often available in 16:9 that weren’t plasma or LCD panels.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      You guys sound like David Silver from 90210. Can’t remember the episode, but the gang plays poker in a beach club house or something and Silver geeks out about back projection TVs

    • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The viewing angles werent that bad. Honestly better than even a modern LCD TN panel. Also, only the newer lcd projectors had the dimming issues. Older models were 3 crts in a trench coat. They have a whole suite of issues on their own.