• Coelacanth@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think you accidentally called the 1964 model 1994. But yeah, the current generation cars are absolute land ships.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    In terms of the ability to accommodate more advanced safety features, yeah. Isn’t that the main reason why road cars have grown too?

    • freeman@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      For road cars yes, a bit is because of safety. For the US its mostly because of the one law about light trucks being work-vehicles and so they didnt get taxed the same or something.

      • Fidgetting@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is that vehicle footprint is used as part of calculating a manufacturer’s CAFE score. So if the car is bigger it doesn’t have to get as good mileage effectively subsidizing large vehicles.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I believe a large part of the size is for aero reasons. For example, the wheelbase is extended by something like 50cm if I recall correctly. Bigger car equals more surface area to fit aero devices on. I think it was the teams pushing for bigger cars to make them go faster.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Bigger cars also accommodate bigger engines (including hybrid systems and their batteries)