Another player who was at the table during the incident sent me this meme after the problem player in question (they had a history) left the group chat.

Felt like sharing it here because I’m sure more people should keep this kind of thing in mind.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      1·
      7 months ago

      I think you have trouble understanding the difference between definitions for words or the context of general terms and your own personal experience.

        • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
          1·
          7 months ago

          You didn’t answer my question (“Where did I wrote that”) and your answer doesn’t make it clear to me if you even understood my point. So I am not sure why you think it’s me who isn’t having a conversation.

            • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
              1·
              7 months ago

              Do you mean the question where you tried to paint me as dumber than you because I do not agree with your reasoning?

              Yeah, I won’t answer to your narcissistic ramblings because your premise is wrong. I have no trouble understanding your reasoning, I just think it’s wrong.

              What is and isn’t categorized as a disability isn’t subjectively decided randomly. It’s a decision based on our current real life situation. Not your head cannon.

              Autism is considered a disability because of the definition of what makes a disability I provided above. While you personally can say that you feel not disabled, a claim that “autism is not a disability because when people were different it wouldn’t matter” isn’t rational reasoning.

                • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                  1·
                  7 months ago

                  I didn’t contradict myself, you didn’t understood what I was writing. Otherwise, please provide where I contradicted myself.

                  You tried to substantiate your claim that the question whether or not something is a disability depends on (social) context with mentioning that the “flaw” that Michael Phelps has supposedly aided him in being a better swimmer.

                  My point is that, for the definition whether or not something is categorized as a disability, it doesn’t matter whether it is not disabling in certain contexts for certain individuals. Or whether you can imagine a society where it’s not disabling.

                  “Intrinsic” and “non-intrinsic” disabilities, this differentiation does not make sense.