- cross-posted to:
- science@kbin.social
- cross-posted to:
- science@kbin.social
The number of retractions issued for research articles in 2023 has passed 10,000 — smashing annual records — as publishers struggle to clean up a slew of sham papers and peer-review fraud. Among large research-producing nations, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Russia and China have the highest retraction rates over the past two decades, a Nature analysis has found.
The bulk of 2023’s retractions were from journals owned by Hindawi, a London-based subsidiary of the publisher Wiley (see ‘A bumper year for retractions’). So far this year, Hindawi journals have pulled more than 8,000 articles, citing factors such as “concerns that the peer review process has been compromised” and “systematic manipulation of the publication and peer-review process”, after investigations prompted by internal editors and by research-integrity sleuths who raised questions about incoherent text and irrelevant references in thousands of papers.
Absolutely wild that 1 publisher was responsible for around 80% of the retractions.
And also comforting to know which ones I can immediately block
Maybe they should need “pre-authorization.”
I would love a science news resource that would only publish papers about reproduced studies from a different lab than the original.
Lord if you ever find one share it with me please!