Saw this proposal originally posted on Github and thought it was worth posting here and expanding on

This is an excellent idea, I liked awarding posts on reddit on my old username, probably spent quite a bit with reddit until they permabanned me for god alone knows what reason.

This plus Premium memberships would give the admins of the bigger servers such as lemmy.world a reliable income stream that would enable them to maintain and improve infrastructure. The money would go to whichever server a user that buys the awards or Premium membership happens to reside on (for me it’d be lemmy.world)

Its a simple reality that running a server with thousands of users on it costs money and time, and it has to come from somewhere more reliable and lucrative than donations

It does raise an issue in that a payment processor would be required, and a business would have to be created for that as well. Perhaps several instances could co-operate and share the payment processor and create between them an organisation or business for that purpose, there would need be some means of tagging each payment so that it can be directed to the correct instance

I want the fediverse to survive and thrive, and for that it needs some income beyond donations to support instance server costs, bandwidth and the time and effort and resources expended on battling DDOS attacks, bots etc etc

    • waterbogan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dont think that donations are going to provide an adequate financial basis long term - an incentivised scheme or paid memberships will provide a more stable long term financial support. I was about to pay for a reddit membership when they permabanned me 😗

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think allowing paid boosts/paid flairs for recognition are going to lead to the kind of content Lemmy needs to maintain engagement.

        If an instance wanted to implement something like this, they could develop a system for displaying awards on the front end and just store that on a second database. I just don’t think any admins really plan on making that their monetization strategy

      • noodlejetski@geddit.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        an incentivised scheme

        how about this for an incentive: when you donate money, you help keep the lights on for the instance that you’re using.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Speaking as an instance admin, I don’t want this. It would create the idea that we’re selling something to people, and then moderating users that have either received or granted awards would become more complex.

    As it stands now, we have an open donation and we don’t ask for any information about the donors Lemmy account. I don’t want to know

    If people like the instance, they can donate and help us cover some costs, and the reward is improved sustainability for our instance.

    • Kaity A@blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      @ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone Also, the vulnerable whilst being the most in need of protection and a safe place, are often the least able to afford to provide financial support.

      Prioritising “paying” users by giving them special benefits and worrying about the loss of “income” if they need to be moderated tends towards a road that ends up with the minorities paying for it with their safety instead.

      • Jo (she/her)@blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @supakaity @ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

        Makes my heart full to know that my admins think pretty much the same way I do about this. Doing subscription tier BS against people who have multiple intersections as minority folks is some peak online capitalist ick IMO. Rewarding and/or preferencing folks who can pay is just reinforcing more of the structural crap we face on the daily in user-pays driven meatspace.

        #blahajzone

  • Nix@merv.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think its a good idea. If a user post such valuable informatiom that i want to award them id rather they reap the reward themselves and not the admin of the instance they happened to sign up on.

    We should have a lemmy Health Bar that shows us how much funds are still required for the server bill to be covered for the month similar to how reddit showed a decade ago when they were a transparent website like so:

  • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I really miss the profit-centered incentives that drove Reddit engagement :/ Just donate, you get Lemmy in return.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A very bad idea for many reasons, and other people have posted them.

    Lemmy.world being large is self inflicted, chosen and promoted by themselves. It’s not a surprise that having 100k users pick the same server is a bad idea if you want to keep the costs down.

    Their size is creating many problems in the Lemmy fediverse now, because almost all communities and users are on one instance. Anyone not federating with Lemmy.world has no content.

    This is why their decisions matter very much for everyone now also.

    Funding the fediverse should be done by individual instance owners who wants to support a healthy network. This is no longer possible if you let your instance become super big, and that’s why it’s a mistake to become super big.

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds interesting. How is Madison handling the funding issue? Are all admins millionaires, living off the stocks they own, so they don’t really care what the server maintenance costs? If admins are just normal people, they probably do care, and in that case, they probably also ask you to donate.

    Mastodon has been doing this for a bit longer, ao those admins can probably tell you how successful their financial model is. If patreon donations are good enough, then there’s no need to build anything more complicated.

    • PupBiru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      the server requirements of fediverse instances isn’t that high… plenty of people just run hobby servers! as long as we keep that process pretty interesting that could just continue to be the case: people hosting the instances just as a hobby and not expecting a return!

  • sudneo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t generally agree with the idea because I believe it doesn’t incentivize (actually, it goes in the very opposite direction) the cultural shift which is needed. That is, you are the platform, you are not buying anything, you are simply supporting the platform(s) you care about unconditionally.

  • MaxMalRichtig@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This would incentivise instances to keep growing, as more users would potentially mean more income. I don’t think that this is a good idea as it conflicts the decentralized nature of the fediverse.

    I would suggest that we promote donations more. Seriously, nobody is talking about that stuff.

    Furthermore, “money” doesn’t always fix a communities infrastructure issues - people do. Most of the time, admins are a one-person-army. If people would take over work (like moderation, implementing helpful features in code, …) more often, that might help out the admins more than just throwing money at them.

    It is the same as with a lot of open source communities: It’s not all about the money, it’s about people getting active and involved and helping each other out.

  • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think both your idea, and the criticism in the comments are valid (and I’m really glad to see this kind of discussion).

    One potential solution, that would sadly require a major technical change, would be for awards to cost hosting-resources instead of money. For example, if Lemmy used IPFS, then people giving awards could need to pin some amount of files for some amount of time in exchange for an award.

    This means every award would make Lemmy MORE decenalized, which also helps with admin costs of hosting servers.