NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft has experienced a computer glitch that’s causing a bit of a communication breakdown between the 46-year-old probe and its mission team on Earth.

  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    284
    ·
    10 months ago

    For those who didn’t read the article, voyager 1 is still sending and transmitting data. It’s stuck in a loop sending the same packets to Earth on repeat but it is receiving commands just fine. It’s not completely dark.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s fantastic, that means all they have to do is reset some components and it should restore functionality. I say should, it’s still a scary thing to turn on/off components om a satellite bcz you aren’t guaranteed they’ll come on. Nasa people usually prefer soft resets to hard resets of components, but we’ll see what happens.

      One of the satellites I worked on had to have a software update to do a soft reset of a component every time it tried to write certain data. It was really scary bcz we thought we had lost one of our redundancies right after launch, which would have sucked.

      But, we didn’t. Anyway, just wanted to give a little bit of insight into what the FOT might be thinking about while they’re trying to recover the satellite to nominal state.

      • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah I got very sad when I saw the headline and breathed a huge sigh of relief. Voyager 1’s death will be far sadder than most public figures. Maybe any.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          10 months ago

          Same, for a moment I was really concerned. Voyager is like a lifetime achievement for humanity at this point. When it stops communicating its going to be a big loss for the scientific community, and population as a whole. I’m not looking forward to hearing about its loss of functionality in the next decade or so.

        • gazter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t know if I would consider Voyager to be ‘dead’ if it stops transmitting.

          If I put a message in a bottle, with a blinky light on it, then throw it into the ocean, the message is still there even if the blinky light goes out.

    • deleted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      So the title did its job which is you understand nothing until you enter their site, drive traffic, display ads, and possibly collect your data in the process.

      • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sure and Lemmy did its work by letting me and others relay the info. I hate ads as much as the next guy, especially targeted ads, but the internet is free and I don’t pay CNN a dime so I’ll take the hit for you this time. Next time, you click the clickbait and fill us in ☺️

      • Exec@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        possibly collect your data in the process

        Nooo they respect your privacy just share your stuff with 967 of their partners

        • deleted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          My point is the title in journalism went from a summary of the story to a confusing false statement that might give you a hint of what the story is about.

          In this story the title is clearly saying Voyager has stopped communicating with Earth which is false.

          • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            My point is the title in journalism went from a summary of the story to a confusing false statement that might give you a hint of what the story is about.

            This is what we get when nobody wants to pay for news anymore. The fact that news media had to turn to ad-funded models is the fault of everybody who refuses to pay for their news

            • deleted@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The main issue here isn’t ads. The issue is straight up false titles.

              I understand if they opted for vague summary. But false statement is where i draw the line.

              • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                And the reason why they have to resort to clickbait titles is to get people on their site for ad views

                • deleted@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Clickbait and false statements are two different things.

                  If I write a title saying “Joe Biden resigned” and then talk about how most Americans wants Joe to resign this is considered a false statement.

                  But if I write “Americans wants only one thing” then this is a clickbait.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        It takes 45 hours and that’s a good question.

        Perhaps there are multiple distinct channels with one for command responses and another for scientific data?