If we’re including shell scripts/functions as “terminal commands”:
bm()- Zoxide wasn’t quite what I wanted
- Quick jump to a static list of directories with some alias
mkcd()- Basic
mkdir && cd - Some extra stuff for my specific workflow
- Basic
bashlib- My small, but helpful, “stdlib”
gitclone.shgit clonewrapper without needing to give a full URI
md2d.shpandocwrapper- I’m required to provide documentation at work in
docxformat, so I use this to avoid Office as much as possible
If we just mean terminal applications:
hyperfinejqandyq- Honorable mention:
xmlstarlet
- Honorable mention:
shellcheck- Primarily used via LSP
- CLI tool still used when my boss sends me AI Slop scripts I have to fix
A couple of
bashspecific items I’m using quite often these days:mapfileprintf '%(datefmt)T- Annoying
%Tdoesn’t expand to true ISO-8601 compliance
- Annoying
(( expr ))- Truly saves my ass every year in Advent of Code, despite the limitations
exit
I’d say
cd rm mkdir suand many more 😂
for file in *.WAV; do ffmpeg -i “$file” -i cover.png -disposition:v attached_art “$(basename “$file” .wav).flac”(I’m doing this from memory, so I may have messed something up, but that’s the gist of it for taking a bunch of WAV files and turning them into FLACs with cover art. I also do a similar setup for combining the metadata of an MP3 and audio data of a WAV, since They Might Be Giants seems to have forgotten FLAC was invented.)
I have a script named
din my PATH and it contains this:("$@" > /dev/null 2>&1 &)It allows me to run any program in a fully detached state in a way that works even if the terminal that started the program closes, and it’s as simple as
d <command>.Shouldn’t you end with
& disownto fully detach?IIRC
disownis a shell built-in command, so its use is a bit limited. Not sure if&is also a built-in, but I founddisownto not work in some situations. Besides, it’s shorter.shell built-in command
After looking into it a bit more, its at least a builtin for
bashbut is otherwise not POSIX. I guessnohup ... &would be the POSIX compliant equivalent, though still not a builtin.Its my understanding that
&backgrounds, not necessarily detaches, a process – if the parent process closes, I think the background tasks would still bewait()ed on, if only using&.
How does this even work? I get the redirection part, but how is the command executed in a detached state?
()creates a subshell, and&runs the command in background. The$@means everything after the first argument, so the<command>is executed like a normal command. I am not sure why this works, but it has worked more consistently thannohup,disown, and it’s a lot shorter than most other solutions.the last & is like doing “command &”. d is a function that takes argument and $@ is usually the first argument
good idea, I’ve been manually typing out variations of this as needed for years.
grep, sed, awk, and find
What do y’all use awk for really? 20 of using Linux, I’ve never had to use awk. And I’ve done a looot of scripting in my days. Anything from building my own clone of polybar using eww (with loads of scripts underneath), to automated systems for bulk handling of student assignments back at uni when I used to help out with grading and such.
What’s awk good for that other standard utilities can’t do?
I both love and hate awk – on the one hand, it provides the same/similar functionality of similar tools (sed, grep, cut, etc); but it is a bit of a bear and can be pretty slow.
If you need more “complex” tasks done what would be cumbersome with the rest of the standard tooling, and performance is a non-issue, awk/gawk can probably get it done.
Though, I too am trying to use it as little as possible in scripts. I think multiple subshells/pipes is still better than awk in some cases. Syntax also leaves a lot to be desired…
My experience exactly. I’d rather use a specific tool designed for the task than invoke a whole new language. It just feels… icky for some reason.
There are times when dealing with annoying field separators that
awkis a more convenient tool – though, I’m also now at the stage that I want to do as much withbash-builtinsas I possibly can.
I use awk instead of cut cause I can remember the syntax better.
ps aux | grep zoom | grep -v grep | awk ‘{print $2}’ | xargs kill -9
May I interest you in the command
killall? 😁You can get rid of those
greps, btw:ps aux | awk '/zoom/ && $0 !~ /awk/ {print $2}'Or just use
pgrep.The greps were much more legible that this concoction 😅
But I second the use of pgrep. 👌
Better yet, just
killall zoom.
I’ve been using Linux for 25 years,
awkis a more recent addition to my arsenal, but rapidly becoming more and more useful.For example,
awkis extremely helpful if you want to rearrange columns, do math on columns, essentially do things that would take multiple lines ofbashwithcutandread.I used to switch to
perlorpythonif I neededawk. These days I don’t tend to run into it as much. Not sure if that was a good choice. But it’s how I spent the past 25 years.That makes sense! I think I’d be running Nushell for this if the scripts didn’t need to be very portable, sounds like a good use case for that.
I usually use something like awk ‘{print $2}’ to get a bit of some output
Ex: list processes, grep for the line I want, then awk out the chunk I want from that line (the pid):
ps aux | grep myprogram | awk ‘{print $2}’
That’s the only think I know how to do with awk, and I reach for it a lot!
cutis purpose-built for that function, and is supposedly easier to understand; but it doesn’t seem to just work like awk does.I think
cutis a little bit finicky because two consecutive occurrences of the cell delimiter counts, and gives an empty cell when selecting the index between them.chooseis a bit better at this from what I remember, which is like the moderncut, I believe, of course written in Rust.Otherwise Nushell excels at this sort of thing, although I don’t really use it.
Oh, I hadn’t heard about
choose!I have been using Nushell, and you’re right, it is great at parsing input. Commands like
detect columnsandparseare very nice, and have been supplanting awk for me.
xkill :-(
When I’m in some subdirectory of a git repository, I use this command to jump to the repo root:
alias gtop="cd \$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"What I do with all git related aliases is I alias git to just
gin the shell. Then for any alias I want that uses git I just put that alias in the global git config under the alias section.This avoids polluting the shell with a bunch of git-specific aliases. Just the one,
g.I certainly see the value in this strategy! But I’m not going to give up my top-level aliases. I enjoy saving two keystrokes too much!
Here are my most used aliases (these ones use Nushell syntax):
alias st = git status alias sw = git switch alias ci = git commit alias lg = git log --color --graph '--pretty=format:%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%cr) %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset' --abbrev-commit alias push = git pushI was also delighted to learn that I could get the same short aliases for corresponding fugitive commands in vim/neovim using the vim-alias plugin:
-- This is a lazy.nvim plugin module return { 'Konfekt/vim-alias', config = function() -- Shortcuts for git operations to match some of the shell aliases I have. -- For example, `:sw ` expands to `:Git switch ` vim.cmd [[Alias sw Git\ switch]] vim.cmd [[Alias ci Git\ commit]] vim.cmd [[Alias pull Git\ pull]] vim.cmd [[Alias push Git\ push]] vim.cmd [[Alias show Git\ show]] vim.cmd [[Alias re Git\ restore]] vim.cmd [[Alias lg GV]] end, }Fugitive is very nice for integrating git workflows in the editor, and its commands have very nice tab completion for branches and such.
two keystrokes
For me I’d be saving one keystroke. Status for me would be
g s,g cfor commit, and so on. Single letter aliases for the most common commands, two letters for less common in a conflict. 😁But these days since a few years back I just use lazygit (aliased to
lgbtw, lol).Everything in lazygit is basically just single keystrokes also.
cfor commit, etc. Very handy.Fugitive
Cool beans, sounds like a good tool! I’m on team Helix since a few years, after being a vim/nvim user for about a decade, and emacs a couple years before that. Helix’s paradigm just makes so much sense. 🎯👌 Jumping around symbols intra-file and inter-file, and LSP support built-in, no fussing. Worth a try for a few weeks if you ask me.
Oh yeah, I do find Helix interesting! I sometimes recommend it to people who don’t have a background with modal editing as a batteries-included option for getting started. I have tried it a little bit myself. It’s hard for me to give up leap.nvim and fugitive, which is holding me back.
I’ve been meaning to try out dedicated git programs to see how comfortable I can be without fugitive. Tig is one that caught my eye. Or sometimes I even think about using Gitbutler because its virtual branch feature seems very useful, and I haven’t seen any other tool that does that.
I think the best way is just take the leap, and try it out for real. 😉
I used Tig before lazygit actually. It’s great for getting an overview of history. But lazygit I think is more focused on the current state, and workflow-oriented. It is very easy to drop commits, rebase, edit commits, etc.
I’m not sure what virtual branches are or why I would need them but sounds interesting. 😅
Maybe “alias u=cd …” or “alias mkcd=mkdir -p $1 && cd $1”
Totally forgot my favorites. C=clear, vi=nvim, l=eza -lh
I like
mkcd! I have the same thing. Although what I use more is a function I pair with it that specifically creates a temporary directory, and cds to it. It’s useful for temporary work, like extracting from a zip file.These are my Nushell implementations:
# Create a directory, and immediately cd into it. # The --env flag propagates the PWD environment variable to the caller, which is # necessary to make the directory change stick. def --env dir [dirname: string] { mkdir $dirname cd $dirname } # Create a temporary directory, and cd into it. def --env tmp [ dirname?: string # the name of the directory - if omitted the directory is named randomly ] { if ($dirname != null) { dir $"/tmp/($dirname)" } else { cd (mktemp -d) } }
pacman -Syu chown chmodI have to dual boot for work, so every day I have to reboot into a different OS install. It’s on its own drive with its own bootloader, so I can’t use
systemctl reboot --boot-loader-entry. But I was able get a smooth process usingefibootmgr.This is my Nushell implementation:
def boot-to [ device: string@boot-devices # Identifier of device to boot to (e.g. 0003) ] { sudo efibootmgr --bootnext $device systemctl reboot } # This function exists to provide tab completion for boot-to def boot-devices [] { efibootmgr | parse --regex 'Boot(?<value>\S+)\* (?<description>(?:\w+ )*\w+)' }namei -om to check permission issues
top, obviously.











