• jjjalljs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Usually some people will take initiative and some people will delegate their responsibilities. Form committees , that sort of thing.

      • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Efficiency doesn’t need to be the highest prioritized metric in a business. It’s pretty important, but there are more important things

      • jjjalljs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Even in the capitalist hellscape of tech startups, we have like a frontend group that makes decisions about the front end code that’s separate from the entire engineering org. Likewise there’s one for the backend, for devops concerns, and so on.

        Some orgs are disorganized and require a lot of vertical approval steps, but that’s not an inherent nature of committee

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          You have a head of UX that makes the decisions (at least in the dozens of startups I have worked in/with).

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        For hierarchical committees where order needs to come from the top down, sure, your sarcasm is warranted.

        Still, there are other structures of committee organization that are horizontal in nature and allow for much more flexibility when it comes to needing to make decisions.