the EPA is changing its cost-benefit analysis process for common air pollutants. Instead of comparing the economic cost of a certain pollution limit to an estimate of the economic value of the resulting improvements in human health, the EPA will just qualitatively describe health benefits while carefully quantifying economic costs.
You must log in or # to comment.
I’m excited to hear a qualitative description of the health benefits of a given company’s pollution
Fucken clowns. The title makes the article sound a little confusing but whats the point of profits if we’re all dying from toxic air?
Fuck it, put lead and sulphur back into gasoline
