Why limit compassion from any that really want to live? Being human should not be a prerequisite for being a subject of compassion. I understand defense is needed against biting pests, but animals being used are not that but defenseless beings in captivity, from the demand from any of us, who could choose differently, and have healthier ways with that, which I showed in my previous posts, while it does not demand as many resources and as much land and water with diminishing environments and contributing to loss of species.

  • lalo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    By your semantics, someone who doesn’t abuse children can say they protect children from abuse. If someone comes up to me and says “I protect children from abuse”, I interpret that completely differently from “I don’t abuse children”.

    The same could be said about boycotting companies that [are doing something]

    If you truly are against doing something, can you support it while being against it?

    Are you against needlessly exploiting animals?