“The president has been adamant that we need to restore Roe. It is unfathomable that women today wake up in a country with less rights than their ancestors had years ago,” Fulks said.

Biden has been poised to run on what has been described as the strongest abortion rights platform of any general election candidate as he and his allies look to notch a victory in the first presidential election since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022.

Last month, Biden seized on a case in Texas, where a woman, Kate Cox, was denied an abortion despite the risk to her life posed by her pregnancy.

“No woman should be forced to go to court or flee her home state just to receive the health care she needs,” Biden said of the case. “But that is exactly what happened in Texas thanks to Republican elected officials, and it is simply outrageous. This should never happen in America, period.”

  • ApostleO@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, what’s he supposed to do right now? Republicans still control both houses of congress (or, at least, hold enough seats to render both houses impotent). The upcoming congressional elections matter as much as (or potentially more than) the presidential election.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And next term, when the Republicans control both houses of Congress, he also won’t be able to do anything about abortion.

      This is why I’ve stopped believing presidential candidates when they say they’re gonna do things. They’re one branch of government, so there’s only so much they could possibly do, and even that will take years.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      He had zero issues going around Congress to “sell” weapons to Israel to be used in an o going genocide…

      Bonus points:

      They “bought” the weapons with American taxpayers money after Biden had just given it to them.

      Why can Biden go around Congress for that, but not for what would help Americans?

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because the president can’t create a constitutional amendment. They are not a member of the legislative branch. He can provide emergency military support, being the leader of the executive branch (head of the military)

        I don’t agree with what he did, but it is under his perview apparently. Much like he can send our troops to fight for ~90 days before needing congressional approval. Essentially creating a situation that you are already in a war by the time congress can say no

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          He can fix the supreme Court all on his own by adding members, then the case can be brought up again.

          But let me guess, you think if Dems do that, Republicans will somehow do even more of what they’re already doing?

          So we’re going to ignore the stolen SC, because if we take it back legally, they might steal it again?

          And people wonder why 1/3 of the country don’t vote.

          Only one side is actually fighting, the other wants to pretend there’s no war because then people will ask them why they let it get this bad

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, I suspect they’ll have no problem getting those new judges confirmed through the Senate. Genius play.

            I get that you’re frustrated. We all are. But attacking the people who are mostly on your side instead of the people actively trying to hurt you doesn’t help.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              A firefighter standing by my house while it brings down isn’t helping me.

              Especially when he keeps telling me I need to work with the arsonist who set the fire and unless the arsonist agrees, he has no choice but to stand there socializing with the arsonist

              I can say we need a different firefighter and that if the only other option is the arsonist…

              Then ignoring that our system is broken doesn’t help anyone.

              All it does is make less people vote on who the next firefighter is, and gives the arsonist better odds of winning.

              I know it’s tempting, but burying your head in the sand won’t fix anything anymore than it has with climate change

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Ok but the alternative wants me dead. He’s promising to strip my rights and get rid of people like me. So maybe some of us see y’all standing and taking this position and think “wow, we’re fucked”. Because you can’t even bring yourself to vote for a liberal against a fascist. Vote in the primaries like the rest of us. Try to convince moderates to vote left as they can.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Do you honestly think everyone that criticizes Biden won’t vote for him?

                  Jill Stein would have gotten second place if that was true. Most of the votes moderates get are from people that hate them.

                  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    You keep trying to push this narrative that only the far left has any actually significant popularity, like mainstream dem success is all a part of some grand conspiracy or something. But I think the reason most of the dem party in the House and Senate is more moderate, is because there are still a huge number of moderate voters.

                    It’s odd that you’re so reluctant to acknowledge that the dem party is a party of diversity, not some monolith of purity.

          • Pyramid8058@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The number of Supreme Court justices is set by statute. The president cannot add more justices without the support of Congress.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Hes supposed to encourage a floor vote so we can at least find out whos not supporting this and vote them out of congress. But were gonna go into the election without knowing anyone stance, so politicians of both parties can simply claim anything since theres no record.

      • ApostleO@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The leader of each house is Republican, and they control what comes up for a vote. He can encourage all he wants, he has no say in the matter.

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      what’s he supposed to do right now?

      There’s a lot of cases during his presidency where he could do something within his power as president, and go around Congress.

      He has shown he has the willpower to do so when he wants to, just not for things i want. There are many things unrelated to this specific case where it has played out that way.

      To me, a dumb working stiff, it sure seems like he won’t use his power to help people like me. So he and you will have to excuse me on this case, where he may not even have the power (as you said), for not trusting him when he promises me something he knows i want without even promising that he will succeed.

      It is just too cynically timed, and I’ve heard this one before

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s a lot of cases during his presidency where he could do something within his power as president, and go around Congress.

        Then fuck him for not doing that in his first term.

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      And that’s precisely what makes this so fucking meaningless. What’s he able to do in his second term for abortion rights he couldn’t in his first? Neither answer is a good look.