Kay’s speaking style meanders a bit, but he does cover the relevant powers nicely, he gets into the lecture at 70s
TLDW: Applying statistical significance to clinical populations.
You must log in or # to comment.
My main paper toolkit:
- Who said it? (What biases do they have)
- What did they actually say? (not what someone said they said, i.e. news headlines)
- On the basis of what? (Evidence, rigor, applicability; but usually “opinion”, intermediate metrics or hard outcomes?)
- In what context? (i.e. compared to what? high carbohydrate populations with heavy levels of metabolic dysfunction?)
this is a follow-up to https://youtu.be/aaBZMpaYwxk. I probably should do a breakdown of the first howto video