• Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Vaccines aren’t designed to stop infection. They never intended to.

    The vaccine is intended to get your body familiar with the virus so that when you do get it your body knows exactly how to fight it.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Depending on the target, vaccines can allow the immune system to eliminate it before it can start multiplying significantly. For things like measles etc, this effect is strong enough to provide effective immunity. Whether vaccines can stop infections depends a lot on how you define infection. They won’t magically stop the virus being able to enter your body. They can stop them from establishing themselves and stop you becoming infectious to others.

      Unfortunately, the coronavirus family viruses are particularly slippery. Even our primary immunity from infection is often short lived. COVID is ridiculously good at both hiding from the immune system, and spreading to new hosts. The vaccine provides significant protection, but isn’t effective enough to provide complete immunity.

      • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Also basically no country in the world is taking elimination of the virus seriously.

        In fact - Australia’s stance is “get your arse back on the office/school/factory you ugly mug”, and that’s about it.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s because it is unreasonable to take elimination of the virus seriously at this point. It’s like saying no one is taking seriously the elimination of cold and flu. For better or worse, it’s here to stay. Elimination is no longer an option.

          • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Even then, the one thing we should have got right was that you’re required to take sick leave when you’re positive.

            Yet our government says my colleague is allowed to bring COVID into the office twice in a month, further risking the health of my high risk parents and grandparents. As if that’s even remotely acceptable.

            • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              If you’re sick, you get sick leave in Australia, no? If you get covid, just like if you get a bad cold or the flu, you should take your sick leave. That’s why it exists.

              I’m not even sure what you’re saying at this point. That people should be required to take leave when they’re sick? Yes, obviously…

              So your coworker was sick, and you would like the ability to compel them through some authority to go home whenever you think they’re sick? Or they tested positive, were no longer contagious, and came back? I’m honestly just confused.

              • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                They knowingly came to the office with a preventable illness, declared they were positive both times.

                I’d argue it’s a crime, reckless endangerment.

                And if they don’t have sick leave, it’s leave without pay. Idgaf, just don’t come.