It’d probably provoke a less negative reaction if you flaired the post with [AI Art] as noted in the community guidelines…
It’s probably downvoted for being a link with zero explanation of what it is too.
It’s a twenty-minute video with a dozen voice actors. I’m not sure it deserves the same downvote-bait label as some image.
Not declaring it is just going to rage people if they click it without warning.
You’re not wrong to make a case it’s art, has a lot of human effort etc but that case is far stronger when you also warn people it’s AI up front.
Ai trash
Whining about how art was made.
lol this shit is not art
But a stick figure would be, right?
The worst side effect of this technology is all the keyboard philosophers who suddenly declare the true nature of art, because nuh uh this new thing doesn’t count. Never ever. They rendered the visual medium wrong, so there’s no story or message. It’s an un-text! It cannot be judged, except to parrot a four-letter excuse not to think about it.
A) Are you implying that you can only draw a stick figure with a pencil?
B) And nah, the worse side effect of this technology is that any grifter can make useless slop like this with it and continue to clog up the internet.
Heyyy you said the word, now you don’t need to care what’s true!
Now you can personally insult me because I tried to critically engage with your apparent definition of what constitutes expression. No need to distinguish billionaires promising nonsense, versus interested randos using high technology to tell a story. That story’s not a story, if it’s depicted this way!
Look dude, you can pretend you are doing whatever you want, don’t expect other people to sustain the fantasy for you. I don’t have time in my life to waste in anything made with generative AI.
The fantasy of human artists using a tool to convey meaning.
