• Fox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m not sure why you’d advocate for it if you’ve actually read the history, it’s a terrible idea that has failed spectacularly in the past

      • Fox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Talking about price controls which are not the same thing at all. Read about the Nixon shock, for example.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, the relief doesn’t go to agribusiness and might stand a chance of benefiting individual humans, so both parties agree it’s always bad and they’ll never do it.

          • Fox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Sure, instead it’s true based on a simple observation that the president isn’t using executive power to set an upper limit (price control) on the cost of groceries. A subsidy might reduce the starting price of something but a grocery store can still charge whatever they want for it. Which I’m pretty sure is the whole point of this thread?

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I know about a ton of food subsidies that we’re pretty useful, dunno about groceries though.

      Any source?