• gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think honestly the intent is just to be Garfield Minus Garfield, but Heathcliff

    Absurdist Meta-humour driven from some of the punchline being removed

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Garfield minus Garfield creates existential content and sometimes psychosis.

      Heathcliff without Heathcliff just amps up the existing absurdism or changes nothing at all as the titular character is usually irrelevant to the actual dadaist anti joke.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, I’d say that works perfectly fine for single-panel strips.

      Comics readers rely on loads of visual signals to catch the sense of the action, the mood, the intangibles, and so much of that’s been erased in this one.

      Still, the upvotes / downvotes tend to have the final say IME…

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah makes sense

        I think it’s novel, but not like, enjoyable as a comic.

        A “huh, neat” then forget about it after taking a cursory glance kinda thing.

        • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.socialM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think it’s novel, but not like, enjoyable as a comic.

          I think that’s fair. As someone reading through one of Scott McCloud’s commentary on comics right now, your edits are actually pretty interesting to me, and there’s loads to unpack about the framing, the structure, the known details, etc.

          Just that I don’t represent the common reader, lol.