@perchance , or any other authority on the site that can fulfill my request I am
filing an URGENT demand for immediate intervention and total domain deactivation
/ deletion, or the removal of comments regarding the subdomains
perchance.org/ai-chat [http://perchance.org/ai-chat]. This platform is actively
facilitating systemic child sexual exploitation, the distribution of child
sexual abuse material (CSAM) of infants and more, severe extortion, and
predatory behaviors targeting minors. The comment sections and user-generated
outputs within these specific generators contain explicit logs of extremely
questionable fantasies, infant abuse references, and real-world predator
behaviors. Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and
non-functional, leaving a large population of underage users completely exposed
to dangerous individuals without any active safety oversight or intervention. We
already have a case with the NCMEC The case ID is the following: 247751090 A few
witness testimonies can be found here:
user.uploads.dev/file/39f28b26b589b5433cd06e96e3627702.jpg
user.uploads.dev/file/ef0d4fde2ca95bb780e62c42211ed3cf.jpg
user.uploads.dev/file/89bd8506a429c11a2b48e6477c67794a.jpg
user.uploads.dev/file/95659ff95687040c60334ad81674249d.jpg
user.uploads.dev/file/308738d9af319653b9738e402e11a98a.jpg Please, remove the
comments of the site; or the site itself immediately to prevent further illegal
activity! Thank you
This again, isn’t the first time I’ve mentioned this ; given the severity of the activity, and the evidence I’ve provided, why hasn’t there been any action
Child sexual exploitation is universally classified by international law and federal statutes as one of the most severe, non-negotiable violent crimes actively occurring today
The public comment sections and chatrooms are fundamentally server-side 😭🙏🏽💔
“Client-Side Processing: Sites that require no login—where scripts and data are temporarily processed directly in the visitor’s browser or local device—minimize server-side data logs. By not retaining user history, these platforms often bypass liability for the content users generate locally.”
If User A posts a link to illegal material, and User B (miles away) can see and click that link, that data must pass through and be hosted by Perchance’s servers to sync the chatroom. It is not “local.” Furthermore, federal criminal laws regarding child safety completely override standard civil liability exemptions. You cannot code your way out of a federal crime by claiming, “We don’t use logins.” If federal contraband is being distributed across your network infrastructure and you are notified, which they absolutely have been; you are exposed.
And the material is a mix of both what is generated, and literal real life child exploitation
There is a massive difference between “evading automated censorship” and “evading federal criminal prosecution.” Operating as a “decentralized sandbox” or keeping a “low profile” does not grant a platform a magical invisibility cloak against the law.
How the Law Sees It: Under established internet law, a platform is not required to prevent every single bad thing from happening in real-time. It is required to provide a mechanism for users to report abuse and a process to remove illegal content once they are made aware of it.
Good Samaritan Protections: Under Section 230, platforms are actually encouraged to use automated filters and community reporting. The law protects developers who make a “good faith” effort to moderate their platforms, even if some bad content occasionally slips through the automated cracks.
Nothing has been, that’s the issue. Someone literally leaked their trafficking profile on Telegram, on there; and absolutely nothing has been done. People still, actively distribute said materials and nothing has been done. “Not reporting everything” implies there’s been some for, of actual active effective moderation, where there has not
S-230 is nullified under both negligence and the distribution of CSM, I explained this in the prior thread
Chatrooms as one of the worst global crimes, that is wild. You know the website that you are using has no identification of its users, and creators of generators can choose to have chat if they want to which you can choose to join or not join. If you want to take action against Perchance you’re welcome to try.
This is some monumental level of ignorance 😭💔
Child sexual exploitation, the distribution of CSAM, and human trafficking; yes, are one of the highest crimes globally
There is absolutely nothing intellectually inconsistent about it
And the creation of the specific gen in question, is the developer themself
You could, at minimum, moderate the room or assign moderators so the issue can be avoided entirely
So, you expect a group of people to basically monitor chats for every particular generator on Perchance that codes in a comments panel? In addition to the AI moderation that is already present. That is impossible in real time. Literally impossible in real time. There is an automated system which is an effort, an attempt. But only so much can be done to manage anonymous users.
New Comment panels are popping up every day on new generators, the gen creators and AI moderation is at play. Perchance is not required to have 24/7 human moderation, this is not some sort of new phenomenon. Creators code those chatrooms in because they want to have have them embedded in their gens and have the freedom to do that. You think that you can bully the Dev into forcing people to not code chatrooms, it’s really brazen.
Child sexual exploitation is universally classified by international law and federal statutes as one of the most severe, non-negotiable violent crimes actively occurring today
The public comment sections and chatrooms are fundamentally server-side 😭🙏🏽💔
If User A posts a link to illegal material, and User B (miles away) can see and click that link, that data must pass through and be hosted by Perchance’s servers to sync the chatroom. It is not “local.” Furthermore, federal criminal laws regarding child safety completely override standard civil liability exemptions. You cannot code your way out of a federal crime by claiming, “We don’t use logins.” If federal contraband is being distributed across your network infrastructure and you are notified, which they absolutely have been; you are exposed.
And the material is a mix of both what is generated, and literal real life child exploitation
There is a massive difference between “evading automated censorship” and “evading federal criminal prosecution.” Operating as a “decentralized sandbox” or keeping a “low profile” does not grant a platform a magical invisibility cloak against the law.
Windydove larp award 🥇
How the Law Sees It: Under established internet law, a platform is not required to prevent every single bad thing from happening in real-time. It is required to provide a mechanism for users to report abuse and a process to remove illegal content once they are made aware of it.
Good Samaritan Protections: Under Section 230, platforms are actually encouraged to use automated filters and community reporting. The law protects developers who make a “good faith” effort to moderate their platforms, even if some bad content occasionally slips through the automated cracks.
Nothing has been, that’s the issue. Someone literally leaked their trafficking profile on Telegram, on there; and absolutely nothing has been done. People still, actively distribute said materials and nothing has been done. “Not reporting everything” implies there’s been some for, of actual active effective moderation, where there has not
S-230 is nullified under both negligence and the distribution of CSM, I explained this in the prior thread
Chatrooms as one of the worst global crimes, that is wild. You know the website that you are using has no identification of its users, and creators of generators can choose to have chat if they want to which you can choose to join or not join. If you want to take action against Perchance you’re welcome to try.
This is some monumental level of ignorance 😭💔 Child sexual exploitation, the distribution of CSAM, and human trafficking; yes, are one of the highest crimes globally
There is absolutely nothing intellectually inconsistent about it And the creation of the specific gen in question, is the developer themself You could, at minimum, moderate the room or assign moderators so the issue can be avoided entirely
So, you expect a group of people to basically monitor chats for every particular generator on Perchance that codes in a comments panel? In addition to the AI moderation that is already present. That is impossible in real time. Literally impossible in real time. There is an automated system which is an effort, an attempt. But only so much can be done to manage anonymous users.
Yes, I expect basic HUMAN moderation considering the site is now an arguable high risk intermediary; I cannot stress this enough
This will legally come to screw the site later, so; it’s either moderate the damn official generators, or just pull the plug entirely
New Comment panels are popping up every day on new generators, the gen creators and AI moderation is at play. Perchance is not required to have 24/7 human moderation, this is not some sort of new phenomenon. Creators code those chatrooms in because they want to have have them embedded in their gens and have the freedom to do that. You think that you can bully the Dev into forcing people to not code chatrooms, it’s really brazen.