• CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Better is a wild claim.

    You’re right, gists do seem to update with the static url, however that isnt necessarily better, it now means your gist is effectively under your control, and you can replace the installers with malware packed ones. Operating a software repository/installer requires that people trust you, and that is basically impossible for a no-name dev with no history.

    You ideally should be doing checksum checks as well.

        • ZeSystem@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s open source. Anyone can audit it. You can create your own sources.list, but if you distribute it, you must open the code. Also, “wid info <package_name>” shows the exact URL it downloads from. Example: wid info llvm shows the official GitHub release link.

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Thats how it works in theory, but in practice it comes down to trust more than anything else.

            Its more effort to read and validate your list than it is to just go and download the installer directly. So you need people to trust you.

            • ZeSystem@programming.devOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’re absolutely right. Trust is the real challenge, and I’m just starting to earn it. That’s why I keep everything open and plan to add checksum verification. I know it takes time. I’m in it for the long run.